What are a college's or university's grievance process requirements in evaluating evidence under the Title IX Final Rule?

A college's or university's grievance process under the Title IX Final Rule is that it's required to be consistent and transparent. Regrettably, at some schools, Title IX cases were addressed and adjudicated in a manner that can be equated to a star chamber. If one has an experienced attorney-advisor in his or her corner from as early as possible in the process, this should not take place. The Title IX Final Rule emphasize the fact that the process has to be specifically outlined, made available, and known to the parties involved.

It's going to apply equally to colleges and universities and other post-secondary institutions in addition to K-12 schools. It also has certain major provisions, such as the requirement for a live hearing in the post-secondary institution setting, and also gives it or makes that an option in the K-12 setting in addition to allowing or mandating cross-examination of the parties.

Ultimately, consistency and transparency was the focus of the Title IX Final Rule in terms of how a school needs to establish its grievance process. If you're facing a Title IX case or sexual misconduct concern, having an experienced attorney advisor can help you best navigate the process and can work towards trying to ensure a fair process and a favorable outcome. They should be involved from as early as possible in the grievance process.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.