Stevens Institute of Technology, or more commonly known as Stevens or SIT, handles instances of sexual misconduct within its student body very seriously. The University maintains a Policy on Sexual Misconduct that outlines what behavior is prohibited, as well as the processes for disciplining these behaviors. The policy is upheld and enforced by the University's Title IX Coordinator. The University makes use of different procedures for handling instances of sexual misconduct than it does for standard misconduct.
Sexual Misconduct At Stevens Institute Of Technology
The University will initiate the process for resolving sexual misconduct allegations once a student files a complaint and it is forwarded to the Title IX Coordinator. The student who initiates the process will be known as the "complainant," while the student facing the accusations is known as the "respondent." The Title IX Coordinator will conduct a brief preliminary assessment of the complaint to see what the best process for resolution is based upon the situation. During the process, respondents may be imposed with certain interim measures if the University believes them to be a threat to the University community. These measures can include changes in scheduling or housing or a possible interim suspension. Following the assessment, the Title IX Coordinator will decide whether the matter should be resolved informally or through a formal investigation. Informal resolutions must be voluntarily decided upon by both parties, and include non-disciplinary remedies for the incident. Incidents of sexual assault cannot be resolved through an informal resolution.
Formal Investigation And Resolution
If a matter is to be resolved formally, the University will begin an investigative process. The Title IX Coordinator will select an investigator who will meet separately with both parties and any witnesses. Both parties will be given equal opportunities to present their own information and respond to information presented by the other party. The investigator will then compile a final report on the details of the investigation. The investigator is also responsible for making a determination of responsibility. Decisions are made using the standard of "a preponderance of the evidence." This report is then forwarded to the appropriate University administrator, normally the Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs, who will administer a sanction appropriate to the actions.
Students facing sexual misconduct allegations may select an advisor of their own choosing for assistance throughout the investigative process. Sexual misconduct allegations are very serious in nature and will be treated as such by the University. These allegations can cause long-term negative effects on a student's career throughout their life, affecting both academic and professional goals. Because of potential consequences can be severe, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor throughout the investigation and Title IX disciplinary process at Stevens. Attorneys can ensure a student's rights are protected throughout the process. In addition, if any adverse consequences follow the allegations at Stevens Institute of Technology, an attorney can serve as a guide.
Appeals at Stevens Institute Of Technology
If the investigation results in an unfavorable outcome, students are offered a chance to make an appeal. Appeals must be made within five (5) working days of the decision. The grounds for appeal are new evidence, procedural errors, or disproportionate sanctions for the offense.