Stevens Institute Of Technology Title IX Violations

Stevens Institute of Technology, or more commonly known as Stevens or SIT, handles instances of sexual misconduct within its student body very seriously. The University maintains a Policy on Sexual Misconduct that outlines what behavior is prohibited, as well as the processes for disciplining these behaviors. The policy is upheld and enforced by the University's Title IX Coordinator. The University makes use of different procedures for handling instances of sexual misconduct than it does for standard misconduct.

Sexual Misconduct At Stevens Institute Of Technology

The University will initiate the process for resolving sexual misconduct allegations once a student files a complaint and it is forwarded to the Title IX Coordinator. The student who initiates the process will be known as the "complainant," while the student facing the accusations is known as the "respondent." The Title IX Coordinator will conduct a brief preliminary assessment of the complaint to see what the best process for resolution is based upon the situation. During the process, respondents may be imposed with certain interim measures if the University believes them to be a threat to the University community. These measures can include changes in scheduling or housing or a possible interim suspension. Following the assessment, the Title IX Coordinator will decide whether the matter should be resolved informally or through a formal investigation. Informal resolutions must be voluntarily decided upon by both parties, and include non-disciplinary remedies for the incident. Incidents of sexual assault cannot be resolved through an informal resolution.

Formal Investigation And Resolution

If a matter is to be resolved formally, the University will begin an investigative process. The Title IX Coordinator will select an investigator who will meet separately with both parties and any witnesses. Both parties will be given equal opportunities to present their own information and respond to information presented by the other party. The investigator will then compile a final report on the details of the investigation. The investigator is also responsible for making a determination of responsibility. Decisions are made using the standard of "a preponderance of the evidence." This report is then forwarded to the appropriate University administrator, normally the Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs, who will administer a sanction appropriate to the actions.

Students facing sexual misconduct allegations may select an advisor of their own choosing for assistance throughout the investigative process. Sexual misconduct allegations are very serious in nature and will be treated as such by the University. These allegations can cause long-term negative effects on a student's career throughout their life, affecting both academic and professional goals. Because of potential consequences can be severe, students should select an attorney to serve as their advisor throughout the investigation and Title IX disciplinary process at Stevens. Attorneys can ensure a student's rights are protected throughout the process. In addition, if any adverse consequences follow the allegations at Stevens Institute of Technology, an attorney can serve as a guide.

Appeals at Stevens Institute Of Technology

If the investigation results in an unfavorable outcome, students are offered a chance to make an appeal. Appeals must be made within five (5) working days of the decision. The grounds for appeal are new evidence, procedural errors, or disproportionate sanctions for the offense.

If you or your student is facing Title IX charges or sexual misconduct allegations at Stevens Institute of Technology (SIT), contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.