Drexel University Title IX Violations

Drexel University takes a firm stance on any Title IX violations and other accusations of Sexual Misconduct. The University's disciplinary policies on these are upheld and enforced by the University's Title IX Coordinator, and listed in a separate policy, from the University's established Student Code of Conduct, known as OED-3.

Drexel University Title IX Policy

When a student makes a Sexual Misconduct complaint against another, the Title IX disciplinary proceedings begin. The student that initiates the complaint is known as the complainant, while the student with the alleged violations is known as the respondent. The University will begin an investigation. During this time, for the safety of the complainant, certain interim measures may apply to the respondent, such as "no contact orders," class changes, changes to residence, and interim suspensions in certain instances. Following the investigation phase, if the respondent chooses, they may admit responsibility and accept the sanctions that accompany it. If not, the process will move forward to a hearing.


Hearings will be held by a University staff conduct board or an external adjudicator selected by the University's Title IX Coordinator, depending on the seriousness of the circumstances. At hearings, both complainant and respondent will have the ability to make introductory remarks. Following this, the hearing authority will hear witness testimony and present questions to the witnesses and parties involved. The parties may not directly question one another, but can suggest questions to the hearing authority to ask of witnesses or the opposing party. Following this, both parties will present their closing statements and the hearing authority will retire to deliberate. The standard of decision making used will be "a preponderance of evidence." Student will receive the outcome of their hearing in writing.

Student are entitled to an advisor of their choosing. This advisor should be an attorney. When a student faces Title IX allegations, it is not only their academic future that is in distress; a finding of responsibility for Title IX charges can have profound consequences, both short and long-term. An attorney's counsel at a hearing can offer a student insight into methods of argument and questioning used in the courtroom, and can strongly change the outcome of a hearing. Having an attorney early on in the process can greatly help a student negotiate their charges from the University. The earlier an attorney is involved, the more prepared the student will be for their prospective hearing. An attorney will also be able to advise and counsel the accused the regarding any related adverse consequences that may result from Drexel University's proceedings.


In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students can make an appeal. Appeals must be made within ten calendar days of the outcome. The grounds for appeal include a dispute of the severity of sanctions, a claim of improper procedure, or new information that was previously unavailable at the hearing.

If you or your student is currently facing Title IX charges or allegations of sexual misconduct at Drexel University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.