Marywood University Title IX Violations

Marywood University takes a firm stance against instances of sexual misconduct that arise within its student body. The University upholds a Sexual Misconduct Policy to enforce instances of sexual misconduct. The process is overseen by the University's Title IX coordinator.

Marywood University Sexual Misconduct Procedure

The process begins when a complaint is filed with a University official. Students who file the complaint are known as the "complainant," while the student facing allegations is referred to as the "respondent." At times, the complainant may choose to engage in a mediation process to resolve the complaint informally, however, instances of sexual violence or sexual assault are ineligible for an informal resolution, and will always result in a disciplinary investigation. In addition, the University may take certain interim measures to protect the complainant, as well as the integrity of the investigation. This may result in changes to class schedules, housing, and possibly even a temporary suspension for the respondent.

Investigation And Resolution

Investigations will consist of separate interviews with the complainant, respondent, and any known witnesses. At these interviews, students may also suggest witnesses and evidence to be taken into account by the investigation. Investigations may also consider the respondent's past disciplinary history with the University. At the conclusion of the investigative phase, the investigator will generate a written summary of what the facts of the investigation were, including any witness statements. At this point, the investigator will also provide a finding and recommended sanctions to the Title IX Coordinator. The finding will be based on the standard of "a preponderance of the evidence." The Title IX Coordinator may choose to uphold this finding or may present the case to a chosen review panel. The review panel meets in a closed hearing and will meet with just the investigator and witnesses. The panel may call the complainant and respondent as witnesses if it is deemed necessary. Both complainant and respondent are able to submit questions to the review panel for questioning witnesses, and to the respective opposing party. The review panel will make all decisions using the same preponderance of evidence standard as the investigator.

At all stages of the investigative process, students are entitled to the presence of an advisor. Sexual misconduct allegations are incredibly serious charges and can carry severe and long-lasting consequences for students with further academic and professional goals. Because of this, students facing these accusations should select an attorney to serve as their advisor throughout these proceedings. An attorney will be able to provide deep insight into proper cross-examination and witness questioning techniques and can help ensure that a student's rights remain protected as the investigation moves forward. In addition, if any adverse consequences follow or accompany the initial allegations at Marywood University, an attorney can guide a student through them.

Appeals at Marywood University

In the event of an unfavorable outcome, students may have a chance to make an appeal. Appeals must be made within ten (10) working days of the outcome. The grounds for appeal are new evidence, a claim that evidence was not considered, a claim of procedural error, or a claim of disproportionate sanctions.

If you or your student is currently facing sexual misconduct allegations or Title IX charges at Marywood University, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento today.

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.