Why is the ACLU Suing to Stop Implementation of New Title IX Rules?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 22, 2020 | 0 Comments

While many advocates of due process rights have heralded most of the changes announced to the Title IX regulations, not everyone is happy. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) – a group that has filed suit to protect due process rights in the past – has filed a lawsuit against the Department of Education over the implementation of these new rules. This time, the group is seeking to prevent the rule changes that would protect the due process rights of the accused.

According to the ACLU, the impending rule changes would “inflict significant harm” on victims of sexual assault and harassment on campus, and that it would “dramatically undermine” the civil rights of those individuals. The goal of the lawsuit is to block the planned implementation of these rules on August 14.

Due Process and the New Title IX Changes

Civil liberties advocates have long argued that the due process protections of Obama-era Title IX rules were too weak. The accused lacked the right to cross-examine their accuser, and in some cases schools would pursue these claims while protecting the anonymity of the reporting party.

The new rules seek to strengthen the due process rights of the accused in two important ways. The first is that it allows a student facing discipline to confront their accuser. The second is the guarantee of a hearing on their case.

The ability to cross-examine the accuser is vital, but it is not limitless. Unlike in a criminal trial, there are important limits on what can and cannot be asked of another party. In fact, the rules bar students from questioning each other directly. Instead, an advisor or attorney must do the questioning. Even then, the line of questions is limited. The attorney or advisor must propose each question to the hearing officer, who will determine if it is relevant to the case at hand. Irrelevant questions will not be put to the witness.

One area that is specifically covered is a party's sexual history. While the rules generally hold a person's sexual history as irrelevant, there are some exceptions. It is possible to discuss a person's sexual history if it could lead to evidence that another person was the real perpetrator. Additionally, any discussion of prior sexual activity is allowable if it establishes consent between the two parties.

The Purpose of the ACLU Lawsuit

The ACLU covers a lot of ground, but it focuses in large part on the new definition of sexual conduct. Under the new rules, only misconduct that is severe, pervasive, and objectively offense to the point it denies a person's equal access to education can lead to a Title IX case. This language is more restrictive than under Obama-era guidance, but comports with the U.S. Supreme Court's definition of sexual harassment.

It remains to be seen if the ACLU's lawsuit will be successful. However, Title IX hearings will continue one way or another. If you are facing a student disciplinary complaint, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento online or call (888) 535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.