Blog

What’s In a Name, Image, and Likeness? Potential Issues for College Athletics Programs

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jan 17, 2022 | 0 Comments

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the Patsy T. Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act, which was passed as part of the Education Amendments in 1972. You might know this law by its much-more-common moniker of Title IX. And while 50 years might seem like ancient history to many of us, Title IX is still making headlines in the 21st century.

Title IX In a Nutshell

Title IX was passed to prevent, and protect people from, discrimination based on gender in any educational program or activity that is funded, in part or in total, by the federal government. This includes:

  • School districts
  • Charter schools
  • For-profit schools
  • Postsecondary institutions
  • Education agencies
  • Vocational rehabilitation agencies
  • Libraries
  • Museums

Title IX and College Athletics

Almost every aspect of postsecondary education is affected by Title IX, including admissions, campus health services, housing, research labs, and financial assistance. College athletics programs, however, are among the entities that felt the effects of Title IX most extensively and seriously.

This law mandates equitable treatment of all student-athletes, regardless of gender, in terms of athletic recruitment, scholarships, and teams, as well as funding for equipment, travel, facilities, publicity, and many other aspects of athletic programs. In the vast majority of situations, this meant providing equal opportunities to female athletes. Those opportunities do not need to be identical to those that male athletes already enjoy, but they must be equitable.

New Name, Image, and Likeness Opportunities

One such type of opportunity that's currently making headlines is that of using one's name, image, and likeness (NIL) for financial gain. Under rules established by the National College Athletics Association (NCAA), student-athletes have traditionally been ineligible to receive sponsorship or endorsement deals, to sell their autographs or branded merchandise, or to appear in advertisements—until July 2021, that is. Now, several states have either proposed or passed legislation allowing college athletes to pursue NIL-related money-making ventures, with more states sure to follow suit.

However, this landmark shift in the realm of college sports opens a veritable Pandora's box when it comes to Title IX and the potential for schools and their sports teams to violate the law.

How Do NIL Opportunities Affect Title IX Compliance?

At issue is the very real possibility that the institution, its employees, or its athletic booster programs will necessarily become involved with NIL opportunities. In so doing, these entities offer benefits to the student-athlete—and they will run the risk of Title IX violations if they don't provide equal opportunities to all athletes.

One major concern? The relationship between marketing and promotional efforts on the part of a university athletic team or the university itself, and the NIL deals and offers that an individual athlete could receive. Women's athletic teams and individual female team members could argue that their institution is violating Title IX if their events aren't being afforded the same level of marketing efforts as men's teams are—and therefore potentially missing out on NIL opportunities.

Here's another situation that Title IX experts are concerned about. Let's say a local restaurant wants to partner with a male college basketball player. They make a television advertisement that features the athlete practicing free throws—while wearing his team uniform—and then stopping by the eatery to refuel and relax. The ball player has the school to thank for his athletic accomplishments, and by extension, for the money he’ll make from this deal with the restaurant. In other words, the school is involved. Is the college then responsible, under Title IX rules, to actively seek out and provide a similar opportunity for its female sports team members?

Only Time Will Tell How Title IX Is Affected by NIL

Given that this is such uncharted territory, it's impossible to predict just how big an impact the revenue potential of name, image, and likeness guidelines will have on gender equality in postsecondary athletics programs. One thing is for sure, though: it's going to be very interesting for anyone involved in college sports to see what happens when NIL, the NCAA, and Title IX intersect.

If you have been a victim of discrimination or bias under Title IX, whether in athletics or any other arena, contact attorney Joseph D. Lento and the his team at the Lento Law Firm to learn about your rights and how to safeguard them. Give us a call at 888-535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu