Blog

What Do Title IX Funding Requests Say About the Investigation System?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Feb 20, 2020 | 0 Comments

Advocates for victims of sexual assault on college campuses make a lot of demands. One of their regular requests that does not get much media attention, though, is for more funding for Title IX offices at their local college campus.

That request, though, is misguided for several reasons and betrays some of the fundamental shortfalls of the current Title IX system.

Victim Advocates Regularly Call for More Money for Title IX Offices

Just the most recent call for more Title IX funding came from the University of Southern Indiana, a college of 9,000 in Evansville, Indiana. Student organizations representing the interests of sexual assault victims are demanding increased funding for a central office for Title IX, as well as for support groups that are separate from it.

The central Title IX office would give a physical presence for the investigators and would help students know where to go to get help, rather than having to track down individual people scattered around campus.

The support groups outside of the Title IX office would give alleged victims someone to talk to without initiating a formal Title IX investigation.

Spending More Money on Title IX Won't Make Things Fairer

It should be a red flag that all of the requests for increased Title IX funding are coming from victims' advocate organizations, rather than from people who represent the interests of people accused of misconduct.

This discrepancy is because of how the Title IX wing of college administrations has come to represent an extension of victim advocacy in order to secure the interests of the school, itself. Title IX investigators and hearing boards bend over backwards to reach a conclusion in favor of alleged victims. They do this in order to secure funding from the federal government, which requires that schools respond to allegations of sexual misconduct “appropriately.”

But the goals of that increased funding are even more telling. They tend to involve bringing in new investigators and increasing the outreach of Title IX offices. They all focus on bringing more alleged victims forward, rather than building the office's ability to reach legitimate and accurate resolutions to existing claims.

No Title IX funding request includes the costs of retaining a judge or even a mediator to hear Title IX claims, or even to provide training to laypeople and college staffers on the hearing board.

Instead, the advocate organizations behind these funding demands are the same ones that are undermining the ability of Title IX officials to legitimately investigate sexual misconduct claims. They are stripping away the rights of accused students to cross-examine their accusers, and are doing everything that they can to prevent defendants from actually defending themselves, all under the guise of reducing the trauma of reporting misconduct.

Title IX Defense Lawyer and Advisor Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a lawyer who defends students, faculty, and staff members who have been accused of sexual misconduct and violating Title IX. He is also a national Title IX advisor.

Call his law office at (888) 535-3686 or contact him online for help.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu