Canceled Field Hockey Game Gets Reopened When Kent State's Title IX Investigation Finds It Did Nothing Wrong

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Oct 10, 2019 | 0 Comments

A misunderstanding or, at worst, a tone-deaf decision by the athletics department at Kent State University led another college to file a Title IX claim against them.

Now, the fallout from the decision has gotten worse when Kent State decided that it had not committed gender discrimination.

In our next post, we'll explain why the whole situation is getting overblown.

Kent State Kicks Field Hockey Game Off Field to Set Up Fireworks

The women's field hockey teams from the University of Maine, Kent State University, and Temple University gathered in Kent, Ohio, to square off against one another in early September.

The series began with a Friday game that saw Temple beat Kent State 3-0.

However, it was the Saturday game between Temple and Maine that drew national media attention.

With the score tied 0-0 at the end of regulation and the first overtime period, the teams were about to go into a second, 10-minute sudden-death period. If the game stayed tied, it would move to a penalty shootout.

Kent State officials, however, stepped in and stopped the game. It was 10:45 a.m. and the field had to be cleared for a 12 p.m. fireworks display before the Kent State home opening football game. Fire marshal regulations required a 90-minute setup period for fireworks, so the field hockey game had already run 15 minutes too long.

Both teams had been informed back in May that fire regulations required they be off the field by 10:30, though the Director of Athletics at the University of Maine pointed out that the written contract for the game made no mention of the requirement.

The incident attracted lots of attention on Twitter, and even Kent State alum criticized their former school for its decision to put a pre-game fireworks display for its football team ahead of a tight women's field hockey game.

The University of Maine, however, went further. They filed a Title IX claim against Kent State, alleging gender discrimination.

Kent Investigates Itself, Finds No Wrongdoing

As with all Title IX investigations, UMaine's Title IX claim was handled internally – by Kent State, itself.

That investigation proved to be a quick one, and culminated with the finding that surprised no one: Kent State decided that it had committed no wrongdoing or Title IX violation.

The outcome of the Title IX investigation reopened the old wound and subjected Kent State to another round of criticism. As Deadspin so accurately put it, “Kent State Investigates Kent State For Title IX Violations, Finds None.”

The University of Maine was especially critical of the fact that the summary report of Kent State's investigation did not include interviews with the field hockey athletes involved.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

While tone-deaf and harsh, the treatment that Kent State is getting for their decision to cancel the field hockey game is incredibly unfair for what it really is – a contract dispute over the use of its facilities by non-students.

In our next blog, we'll explain why.

Call Title IX defense lawyer Joseph D. Lento at (888) 535-3686 or contact him online if you are facing a Title IX claim.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.