The Important Conversation about Transcript Notations

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 19, 2018 | 0 Comments

The epidemic-like rates of sexual misconduct on college campuses have been an ongoing, nationwide trending topic for years. Discussions centered around how education institutions can minimize and ultimately abolish this misconduct on campuses are continually ensuing, inspiring modifications in a school's approach, procedures, and sanction options. Among these proposed solutions, is the extremely controversial idea to mandate transcript notations for accused students.

The Association of Title IX Administrators sent a newsletter to federally funded colleges, urging them to include automatic transcript notations for students expelled for any form of sexual misconduct. It also mentioned that admissions officers should come up with a system to screen transfer applicants who may be applying due to a sexual misconduct expulsion when it has not been marked on their transcripts. As of now, the majority of higher education institutions do not notate transcripts currently. New York and Virginia, however, have passed legislation requiring colleges in these states to mark these offenses on transcripts.

This push comes in the wake of several high profile cases where students with responsible findings have transferred from school to school undetected. Supports of the effort claim that without these notations, offenders escape accountability and may strike again without proper monitoring. Some survivors, who feel that their lives have been forever changed by the incident, support the effort to ensure that perpetrators feel the same long-lasting consequences.

Opposers of mandatory transcript notations claim that although the effort has its benefits, the bad might outweigh the good. They argue that these efforts may discourage victims from reporting (in cases when victims want to protect their assailants) and that there is no concrete evidence that these notations will make communities safer. Some opposing groups claim the marks resemble missteps of the criminal justice system, they assert that once someone services their punishment, it should end, rather than follow them their entire life.

Regardless of what advocates and opposers think of this effort, the reality is that a transcript notation on the academic record of students found “responsible” for conduct violations is of grave concern to accused students, especially if this notation implicates sexual misconduct. Prospective schools and employers would have access to these records, making it incredibly difficult, if not impossible, for students with marks to continue their academic career, or obtain meaningful employment.

Student Defense Attorney Helping Clients Nationwide

As you can see, a finding of responsibility for sexual misconduct can have incredibly grave consequences that can haunt a student for their entire lives. This is why it's important for all students accused of this misconduct to be represented by a student defense attorney.

Joseph D. Lento has dedicated his entire career to helping students accused of sexual misconduct in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and nationwide overcome their charges, and prevail in Title IX investigations, hearings, and appeals. He can do the same for you. Contact him today for help.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.