Students’ Advice on Preventing Cheating

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Feb 16, 2022 | 0 Comments

In the era of the digital classroom, conversations about academic integrity have transformed. As universities debate the usability of proctoring software, students and staff alike are reinterpreting what “cheating” looks like.

Unfortunately, today's variable understandings of misconduct can spell trouble for students. Students accused of violating a school's code of conduct can face suspension, failed courses, and even expulsion. That said, the ongoing conversation about cheating in the classroom may change how academic institutions assess students' behaviors.

What Do Students Define as Cheating?

Today's definition of cheating no longer involves slipping another student the answers to a year-end exam. Instead, students and teachers have to contend with the complexities of both in-person collaboration and the Internet.

Most teachers consider using a search engine to find question answers to constitute misconduct. Sixty-three percent of students responding to Insider Higher Ed disagree.  Karen Symms Gallagher of the University of Southern California's Rossier School of Education argues that search engines like Google challenge memorization-based curricula. In other words, access to a search engine may better prepare students for their professional future.

Similar arguments have been made in favor of student collaboration. Students living with roommates often ask one about schoolwork. While some instructors consider any form of collaboration to be cheating, students argue that it is both natural and professionally beneficial.

What Drives Students to Cheat?

Students do not always consider their professional prospects when they blur misconduct lines. Instead, fifty-two percent of students report that unrealistic course loads drive them to seek out content answers online or from their peers.

The switch to online education did not make it easier for higher education students to balance their demanding workloads. The combination of at-home responsibilities, a new learning format, and pandemic stress can all contribute to student inattention. When a university measures the whole of its students' value in grades, one can see why students may take every available opportunity to keep their grades high.

How Can Institutions Discourage Academic Misconduct?

Unfortunately, any behavior that a university believes resembles cheating can see a student brought up on charges of misconduct. However, the unclear definition of cheating seems to put the onus for misconduct assessment on universities instead of students.

Based on student survey responses, it seems that the best methods for curbing alleged misconduct involve empathetic teaching strategies. Students facing relentless workloads and real-world stress encourage their professors to embrace flexible submission deadlines, cooperative classrooms, and open-book tests.

While it remains to be seen if American universities will implement these policies, open communication with students is a step in the right direction. The more flexible a university is willing to be, the safer students will be from life-altering charges of misconduct.

Academic Misconduct Lawyers Protect Students' Futures

It is not only students who have different interpretations of cheating. Definitions of academic misconduct vary from classroom to classroom. Students accused of academic misconduct may have to contend with charges they do not understand, or that otherwise seem unjust.

Unchallenged academic misconduct charges can upend a student's professional future. That, however, is where an academic misconduct attorney can come into play.

For more information about best practices in a student misconduct case, call attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm at (888) 535-3686. Parents and students can schedule a case consultation over the phone or through the Firm's online contact form.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.