California Court Awards Accused Student for Proving USC's Title IX System Was Unfair

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Oct 23, 2019 | 0 Comments

A judge has ordered the University of Southern California (USC) to pay the attorney's fees of a student that it had promptly expelled after he was accused of raping a female student in violation of Title IX.

USC Expels Student After Exceptionally Weak Title IX Ruling

The facts of the case are similar to most of the other Title IX incidents.

A male and a female student were attending a “paint party” – where attendees partied and covered each other in colored paint. Importantly, red was a prominent color at the party.

The boy and girl got inebriated, hooked up, and went to the girl's apartment where she claims she was raped. The morning after, she claimed there was “blood” everywhere, though she also admitted that she was covered in paint from the party. She took photos of her colored apartment and went to the rape treatment center.

She did not go to the police. Instead, she went to USC's administration and filed a Title IX complaint. She did not provide her clothing or medical records to the Title IX investigators, and they refused to let the accused student examine them or cross-examine witnesses. The Title IX office also did not interview several important people from the incident and dismissed one witness's statement because the witness said she didn't see blood in the alleged victim's apartment.

The Title IX office used this stilted evidence to find the male student responsible and expel him. He filed a lawsuit but it got dismissed. When he appealed it, though, he won a new trial when the appellate court found that he was denied a fair hearing at the Title IX stage. He then won the second case.

Court Awards Attorney Fees for the Public Value Brought by Lawsuit

After the second case, the California trial court awarded the student $142,100 in attorney's fees.

According to the court, having USC pay the student's attorney's fees were justified because of how poorly it had acted in the underlying Title IX claim. Not only had the student won the case, but:

  • His lawsuit enforced an important public right – the right of students to have a fair trial that complies with their due process rights
  • He helped defend the 44,000 other students at USC, plus all future students, from USC's inadequate Title IX procedures
  • He had amassed huge legal bills to get USC to change its faulty policies

Strangely, USC's arguments against awarding attorney's fees included a claim that the student was actually harming other students on campus by keeping the school from expelling sexual predators. This argument, of course, was undercut by the fact that the accused student had shown that USC's Title IX procedure was set up in a way that prevented it from actually finding out if someone had committed sexual misconduct. In essence, USC was just complaining that the student had stopped them from expelling students because it wanted to.

Joseph D. Lento: Title IX Defense

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer. Call him at (888) 535-3686 or contact him online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.