ProPublica's Investigation Overlooks Repercussions Professors Have Faced During Sexual Misconduct Allegations

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Aug 27, 2019 | 0 Comments

A ProPublica investigation claims to have uncovered previously unreported allegations of sexual misconduct at the University of Illinois' flagship campus in Urbana-Champaign. The investigation makes it seem like these Title IX violations had been covered up by the school. However, because the allegations involve sexual harassment but not sexual assault, the Department of Education chose not to disclose them alongside its investigations of sexual assault on campus.

News of the pending investigation led to serious repercussions for some of the professors it targeted, raising some serious questions about how long they would have to pay for still-unproven conduct.

ProPublica Releases Sexual Harassment Investigations in Illinois

The investigation by ProPublica found that seven professors at the University of Illinois had been accused of sexual harassment, but their cases had slid under the radar. The headline of the story claimed that there were “few consequences” for the professors, but the rest of the piece painted another picture. For example:

  • One professor was accused of making “lewd comments” and trying to create situations where he'd be alone with certain students. The allegations came in 2014. In 2015, he agreed to resign when his contract expired in August 2016.
  • A female professor was accused of stalking a male colleague. She disputed the findings but agreed to retire 10 months later.
  • A college administrator was accused by 8 female students in March and April 2017 of making “inappropriate comments” and of “uncomfortable physical behavior.” He was put on paid leave in April and resigned in August before the investigation was completed.
  • Another professor was cleared twice of accusations that he violated the school's sexual misconduct policy but was placed on paid leave, anyway.

The ProPublica investigation insinuates that many of the professors should not have received any of their salaries while the Title IX investigations were ongoing, suggesting that they should have been fired or held accountable before they were proven guilty.

News of the Investigation Causes More Repercussions for Professors

The article's insinuation that the professors were not penalized at all for their alleged actions also overlooks the fact that many of them confronted problems as news of ProPublica's investigation spread. For example:

  • The college administrator had gotten a job at another college after a year off but was fired a year later when details emerged of his resignation from the University of Illinois.
  • The professor accused of making lewd comments got a job teaching at another college. When ProPublica requested documents from that college for its investigation, the college let him go.

Joseph D. Lento: Title IX Defense and Advising

The idea that these professors have faced “few consequences” for their alleged actions is directly contradicted by most of the story. Some of them were never even found in violation of their school's sexual misconduct policies, but still had to look for new jobs. Those that moved elsewhere – something easier said than done, in this academic climate – only saw their jobs taken away from them by the past conduct they may never have committed.

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and a national Title IX advisor. Call him at (888) 535-3686 or contact him online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.