Unfair Investigations: USC Payout to Accused Student Points To Bigger Issues

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Nov 02, 2018 | 0 Comments

Conversations about college Title IX enforcement in regard to sexual assault and harassment tend to devolve into arguments entrenched in political polarization. With every new development in this federal law comes a mud-slinging match on the political spectrum - either involving liberals and their perceived oversensitivity, or conservatives and their apathy towards victims and so on. In the midst of bureaucratic mayhem, everyone loses sight of the real issue. Backed by evidence and the current climate in higher education, it's apparent that the way in which colleges and universities are enforcing Title IX is deeply flawed.

The rate of lawsuits alleging unfair investigations against schools by both the accused and accusers should have made this clear. More so, a standout case involving the University of Southern California, a student accused of rape, and a massive payout ($111,965 to be exact), may implicate serious issues with colleges and universities on a national scale.

A student identified as “John Doe” filed a lawsuit against USC alleging that his Title IX investigation was “improperly biased.” And thus influenced his school's decision to expel him. According to the lawsuit, USC's Title IX officials forgot to hang up the phone after speaking with Doe. He overheard the officials calling him a “motherf**ker and labeling his accuser, “Roe,” as “a catch,” who is “cute” and “intelligent.”

Doe's attorney asserted that the comments made by the personnel were not mistakes (as the school characterized them as) and that their mistake lied in being overheard. He went on to say that the hostile attitudes and unfair treatment exhibited by these officials is a mutual experience among most accused students going through these process.

The suit also alleged that the school allowed a biased official to oversee the Title IX review panel, leading to the exclusion of a substantial quantity of Doe's evidence in the final report. This evidence included testimony from an important witness, who happened to be the only one who saw Doe and Roe together in the aftermath of the alleged incident.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elizabeth White ruled in favor of Doe. She cited that the investigation was, in fact, unfair and partial. White ordered that the school reinstate Doe for his expulsion and that his attorney fees - estimated over $100,000 - are paid off.

Overlooking the importance of unbiased personnel is where USC and most likely many other colleges go wrong. The service that Title IX officials, panel members, and other staff members provide is of great importance. Their actions will ultimately determine if a case was handled how Title IX intends - with integrity.

Nationwide Title IX Advisor

The only way to make sure your voice is heard and your rights are upheld is to retain a student defense attorney. For respondents, especially, the assistance of an attorney advisor is invaluable in the Title IX process. National Title IX attorney Joseph D. Lento has the skill, experience, and expertise to help you preserve your entitled rights under Title IX and your school's policy. For a case evaluation or more information about his representation, contact him online or give him a call at 888-535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.