Blog

Updated Draft of Title IX Regulations Includes Cross Examination of Accusers

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Nov 01, 2018 | 0 Comments

The Trump Administration's promise to roll back Obama-era Title IX guidance is slowly coming to fruition. Head of the Education Department, Betsy DeVos, has an approach to reform that is nothing short of controversial, from her highly publicized meetings with mothers of male accused students to her linear focus on due process.

In the past, I've covered the leak of the administration's unofficial plans, which were initially outed by the New York Times. The new policies contained what observers of the administration expected: regulations that significantly strengthened the rights of accused students, and minimized liability in the handling of sexual misconduct cases - two reform efforts that DeVos and her associates have fervently addressed.

Now, details about the latest draft of the proposed plans have been revealed in a new report. The upcoming federal rules will state that college students accused of sexual assault must be allowed to cross-examine their accusers. DeVos will likely publish the updated rules in November, reported the Wall Street Journal.

The earlier draft of the rule changes suggested that cross-examination would only be mandated in situations when a school's adjudication process entails a live hearing. The current version, however, would make the provision mandatory for all situations. The latest draft details that in a hearing, the accused and accuser could be seated in separate rooms, with questions posed through a neutral party. But there will be some topics that the accused cannot ask about, such as details about their accuser's sexual history.

The Obama administration discouraged cross-examinations in sexual misconduct hearings because they run a risk of accusers becoming traumatized, as well as them being bullied and harassed. The previous administration felt as if the inherent invasive nature of cross-examinations would discourage victims from coming forward.

Due process advocates, on the other hand, feel that cross-examination is necessary in sexual misconduct cases. They often compare school hearings to courtrooms, saying that courts use them in criminal cases to determine credibility, and could serve the same purpose in schools. They consider the rule a big step in renewing due process rights for those accused of campus sexual assault.

This news comes in the midst of a shift some schools have made in the name of due process. Last week, the University of Michigan said it is revising its sexual misconduct policy to include an in-person hearing where complaint parties would be able to ask each other questions.

As for changes in federal law, I'll keep you updated.

Nationwide Title IX Advisor

The only way to make sure your voice is heard and your rights are upheld is to retain a student defense attorney. For respondents, especially, the assistance of an attorney advisor is invaluable in the Title IX process. National Title IX attorney Joseph D. Lento has the skill, experience, and expertise to help you preserve your entitled rights under Title IX and your school's policy. For a case evaluation or more information about his representation, contact him online or give him a call at 888-535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu