Murky Motivations in Managing Misconduct: The Les Miles Story (Part One)

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 12, 2021 | 0 Comments

In March of 2021, Kansas University placed Les Miles, its head football coach, on administrative leave. Two recent reports had surfaced detailing Miles's inappropriate behavior with female students during his tenure at Louisiana State University. These reports, the Husch Blackwell and Taylor Porter papers, relay information about years of problematic behavior.

Jeff Long, the athletic director at KU, implied that he did not have access to this information when he first hired Les Miles in 2018. Now that this information is coming out, the KU athletic department plans to conduct a full review of these allegations and Miles's past behavior at LSU. (In fact, a later article from KU sports confirms that KU and Les Miles will be ‘mutually' parting ways.)

However, the emergence of the Blackwell and Taylor Power reports has called into question many specific practices, both at KU and at LSU. For example, did Long conduct adequate vetting prior to hiring Miles? Did LSU know about Miles's alleged conduct while he coached students there? If so, what is the state of reporting practices at LSU, such that Miles's behavior went unacknowledged?

Athletic Program's Handling of Misconduct Allegations Called Into Question

According to one of the reports probing Miles's conduct, Miles made several inappropriate requests and comments regarding the female student workers who supported the football team at LSU while he was there. The Husch Blackwell report notes that Miles sexualized the student workers at times, even allegedly making requests about the specific physical characteristics of young female students he wanted to see supporting the team.

Perhaps because of these requests, the Taylor Porter report found that LSU's athletic director, at the time, had banned Miles from being alone with the student workers. While external counsel had apparently advised LSU to fire Miles as early as 2013, Miles merely received a letter of reprimand from the administration.

One potential reason for this lax treatment could lie in Miles's stellar coaching reputation. It may not help that Miles has denied all culpability. According to his lawyer, the so-called damning reports are ‘base and inaccurate,' ‘supported by no evidence,' and ‘warranting no discipline.'

Whatever the reason, it's clear that Miles did not receive any real repercussions for his sexual misconduct until 2021. LSU fired him for unrelated reasons in 2016, and KU hired him in 2018. The fact that neither athletic program realized, reported, or disciplined his actions calls into question each universities' motivations - and their reporting mechanisms.

Call an Experienced Sexual Misconduct Defense Attorney to Protect Your Reputation

As the Les Miles story makes clear, academic institutions and athletic programs can sometimes have motivations at play beyond upholding their own policies and procedures. If your job or reputation is at stake in a sexual misconduct adjudication process, you need to make sure that your school doesn't steamroll over your rights.

Regardless of your school's incentives to squelch allegations or pursue aims other than justice, you need to ensure that your reputation remains clear. That's where Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm will be able to help. He will aggressively fight for you and your future. Call us at 888-535-3686 today to learn more about next steps.

This is the first in a two-post series delving into the details of Les Miles's story. Check out the second part here.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.