Michigan State Loses Judge Two Months After Hiring Him to Correct Their Title IX Process

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 29, 2019 | 0 Comments

Two months after they hired him and three weeks after we blogged about it, Michigan State University and retired appellate court judge Michael Talbot have announced that they are parting ways.

The announcement comes as a blow to a college beset with problems in their Title IX process, that is on a tight schedule to overhaul its investigation and hearing process for sexual misconduct cases, and that is still reeling from the Larry Nasser scandal.

Michigan State University Parts Way with Judge, Citing Scheduling Conflicts

Michigan State has been scrambling to correct its Title IX process after a federal appellate court ruled that it violated an accused student's due process rights if they were not allowed to cross-examine complainants and other witnesses. In an attempt to remove the tarnish on the school's reputation from the Larry Nasser scandal – the former U.S. national gymnastics team doctor had worked at MSU – the university sought the help of a retired judge from the Michigan Court of Appeals, Michael Talbot.

Judge Talbot had not just risen in the ranks on the bench; he had also served as a chairman at the Archdiocese of Detroit, where he reviewed sexual abuse allegations against the clergy, there.

News that Judge Talbot would join MSU to create a new Title IX process that would investigate and hear allegations of sexual misconduct while still preserving an accused student's due process rights was seen as a good sign.

The relationship lasted a mere two months. The official reasons given for the parting of ways were “scheduling difficulties.” Judge Talbot had been brought on board to oversee six sexual misconduct cases that were being used to test Michigan State University's newly revamped Title IX procedure.

Since being hired, though, he had only conducted pre-hearings on two cases.

Judge Talbot lives in Detroit, while the hearings took place at MSU's campus in East Lansing, a 90-minute drive away.

What Now for Troubled Michigan State?

Michigan State still has to reform its Title IX process to bring it back in line with the constitutional rights of accused students. Without the professional eye of a retired judge on the case – someone whose job it had been to impose due process on a contentious litigation – Michigan State finds itself facing a lot of guesswork, once again. It will have to decide where to draw the line between the interests of the accuser and the rights of the accused.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and a national Title IX advisor. He helps accused students navigate a complicated investigation and hearing system that can – and often is – designed so they fail it. Overcoming these problems with the system can be difficult, but preserving your rights, your future, and your reputation is well worth the effort.

If you have been accused of sexual misconduct and are facing Title IX charges at your college or university, reach out to Joseph D. Lento by calling his law office at (888) 535-3686 or by contacting him online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.