The Title IX Case That Set The Precedent For Campus Sexual Misconduct Policy

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Sep 11, 2018 | 0 Comments

The Department of Education enforces Title IX, a federal law that protects people in education institutions from sex-based discrimination. It's been applied in situations involving collegiate athletics, financial aid, admissions, and now one of the biggest issues to date, sexual assault, and harassment. One way to fully grasp Title IX's evolution and its significant role in higher education is to understand its roots. Much like most major policy decisions, the judgment to deem campus sexual misconduct as sex discrimination began with a case.

Five years following the establishment of the statute, Title IX was linked to sexual misconduct for the first time ever. A lawsuit was filed in 1977 by multiple female Yale attendees, who alleged that male professors were bribing female students with good grades and academic advancement in return for sex. It came exactly 10 years after the institution had begun admitting women into its undergraduate school. A club on Campus named the Undergraduate Women's Caucus discovered just how common these propositions were through a college-wide survey that asked women to share their experiences at Yale.

But the most notable aspect of the lawsuit, Alexander v. Yale, was that it first tested the theory of sexual harassment as a legitimate form of sex discrimination. The plaintiffs claimed that they made numerous complaints to Yale but were met with little recourse. In conclusion, they suggested that instead of a reward of financial compensation, grievance procedures for sexual harassment claims on campus should be instilled.

But, despite their efforts, the court dismissed the plaintiff's claims because most of them had graduated. And the only student still in attendance claims was denied because she didn't receive better grades. Despite this loss in court, Yale still decided to establish a harassment grievance board on campus and implement official reporting procedures. A move that hundreds of colleges across the country would emulate. The American Civil Liberties Union later defining Alexander as a "pivotal moment in Title IX history," and a case truly ahead of its time.

Today, Title IX and campus sexual assault policy are still developing. The focus shifts now from establishing a policy to finding ways to make its enforcement equitable. All in an effort to keep students from having the same experiences students had 40 years ago.

Nationwide Title IX Advisor

The only way to make sure your voice is heard and your rights are upheld is to retain a student defense attorney. For respondents, especially, the assistance of an attorney advisor is invaluable in the Title IX process. National Title IX attorney Joseph D. Lento has the skill, experience, and expertise to help you preserve your entitled rights under Title IX and your school's policy. For a case evaluation or more information about his representation, contact him online or give him a call at 888-535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.