Blog

How a “Blue Wave” Might Impact Title IX

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Sep 04, 2020 | 0 Comments

We are now just a few weeks away from what may be one of the most consequential elections in our nation's history. Only four years after Republicans took a majority stake in both houses of Congress and the White House, polls indicate Democrats are now within striking distance of accomplishing the same thing. Given the polarity between the parties on many issues (education among them), it stands to reason that a “blue wave” sweeping through Congress and the White House could result in sweeping changes throughout the educational system—including some significant differences in how Title IX provisions are interpreted. Let's discuss some of these possibilities so students facing these issues may be better prepared.

Reinstating Obama-Era Guidance

Title IX has been in effect in this country since 1972 as part of the Education Amendments. It states: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” In 2011, the Obama administration expanded the interpretation of the “basis of sex” clause to include incidents of sexual harassment and assault. This change effectively made it easier for students claiming to be survivors of sexual assault to seek the protections of Title IX, and schools were subsequently required to process these complaints under Title IX regulations.

Under the Trump administration, Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos rescinded this Obama-era guidance, effectively rolling back the clock on Title IX interpretation and allowing schools more latitude in how they process sexual harassment and assault complaints. If the Democratic Party assumes control of both houses and the White House, we can expect Obama-era Title IX rules to be promptly reinstated.

Reversing New DeVos Guidelines

Not only did the current administration roll back Obama-era guidelines—they established some of their own. In May of this year, Betsy DeVos announced a new set of rules that afforded new due process protections for students accused of sexual harassment or assault under Title IX. Under these new rules, which formally took effect in August, schools now are required to allow accused students to face and even cross-examine their accusers in a live hearing, similarly to the judicial process of the court system. Critics of the rule say it will discourage legitimate sexual assault survivors from coming forward; advocates say it will prevent students who are falsely accused from losing their educational benefits.

Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden has openly criticized the DeVos rule as an attempt to “shame and silence survivors.” He has promised that if he is elected, reversing this rule will be among the first things on his agenda.

The Upshot

The next few months pose plenty of uncertainty for schools and colleges on many levels—not just in trying to keep students safe during a pandemic, but also in figuring out how to uphold the law while affording due process to their students—and even reinterpreting what “due process” means. Schools have already begun rewriting many of their policies to account for the new DeVos rules—even as they realize these new policies may become irrelevant in the next several months.

Attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm continue to monitor this evolving situation carefully so we may provide the best and most current guidance possible for students facing disciplinary action under Title IX. For more information, contact us here or call 888-535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website.  In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County.  In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County,  In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties.  Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law.  The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship.  The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu