Blog

Grand Jury Indicts Former Teacher’s Aide

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Nov 27, 2020 | 0 Comments

Heather Rose, 38, a teacher's aide in Texarkana, Texas was involved in a consensual relationship with a 17-year-old student for months. She may have thought that since the relationship was consensual and the student was 17 (the age of consent in Texas), she was doing no wrong. Or perhaps she knew she was crossing the line, but her private life was her business and didn't think she'd be caught. The teacher's aide was dead wrong on both counts. Texarkana police arrested Rose in September 2020 after school district officials were notified that Rose was in a consensual relationship with a 17-year-old male student. Rose was charged with “improper relationship between educator and student” and faces 2 to 20 years in prison and a fine up to $10,000 if convicted.

College Policies On Consensual Relationships With Students

Relationship policies vary from college to college and often overlap with other Employee and Title IX policies which apply to professors and graduate student teaching assistants. For example, at Michigan State University maintains a Conflict of Interest in Employment Policy and a Relationship Violence and Sexual Misconduct Policy. If you are a teacher's assistant or other university employee accused of an improper relationship with a student, you must consult your university handbook for current policies on staff-student relationships, as well as any relevant Title IX, Sexual Misconduct, and Employee Policies. It is highly advisable to find an expert Title IX attorney-advisor, up-to-date on the constantly shifting university relationship policies.

Prohibited Relationships Usually Apply Only To Supervisory Roles

Most universities make allowances for consensual relationships between grad and undergrad students when the graduate student does not have a supervisory role. For example, Tulane University’s policy is consistent with most universities: “faculty, graduate students, staff and administrators employed by the University shall not engage in consensual relationships with students relative to whom they hold a position of authority in such matters as instructing or otherwise evaluating, supervising, or advising the student as part of any school program or activity, whether academic or non-academic.” When a consensual relationship exists or develops, the employee must end the position of authority over the student and notify university administration. If the person in authority or the student declines to dissolve the institutional relationship, the university will take steps to do so.

Some Colleges Ban Staff-Student Relations Across The Board

More and more universities are instituting stronger restrictions on faculty-student and employee-student relationships in the era of the “Me Too” movement. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia, and Duke Universities adopted prohibitory policies against dating undergraduates under any circumstance, not only where a supervisory relationship exists. Blanket relationship bans are controversial, and many people in academia oppose them. One professor wrote a paper last year arguing against blanket bans, “because adults have a fundamental right to engage in intimate relationships without interference.” Brett Sokolow, the president of an academic association for Title IX compliance, believes that behaviors that “cross the line are already addressable under existing policies…the Draconian rules being implemented on many campuses now are both infantilizing and over-broad.”

College Disciplinary Measures For Improper Consensual Relationships

As an employee respondent facing a claim of an improper relationship with a student, you face potential disciplinary action, and your reputation and career may be negatively impacted. Upon receiving a complaint, the college has a responsibility to investigate promptly, fairly, and equitably and grant you privacy within the confines of the university. Federal guidelines emphasize that all parties to these actions are entitled to proper due process rights. Unfortunately, there are instances where institutional administrators may fail to consider the rights of employee respondents or even violate the rules and regulations listed in their own code of conduct to disadvantage respondents. A knowledgeable Title IX attorney-advisor can effectively defend your rights and maintain your professional reputation.

Contact An Experienced Title IX Attorney-Advisor

Attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm have the experience necessary to achieve positive results in actions against university professors, teaching assistants, and other employees accused of an improper relationship with a student. He will protect your right to due process and pursue a favorable outcome. Contact the Lento Law Firm today at (888) 535-3686 for more information.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu