Has Encouraging Sexual Assault Victims to Come Forward Made Them Entitled?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Nov 19, 2019 | 0 Comments

Michigan State University continues to get sued under Title IX. In the most recent lawsuit, a student claims that she was “dissuaded” by school staffers from reporting two sexual assault allegations.

Reading between the lines of the lawsuit, though, reveals just how entitled alleged victims have become, and how much the media and the organizations that advocate for victims have enabled that entitlement.

Michigan State University Sued for Title IX Violation, Again

The lawsuit, which was filed on November 10, claims that members of MSU's Title IX office “dissuaded” an alleged sexual assault victim from making a report.

The student, who identifies herself and is not proceeding under a pseudonym – the normal practice for Title IX cases – says that she approached Michigan State's Office of Institutional Equity to speak with a Title IX investigator about two alleged sexual assaults.

The first had happened the year earlier. She had been dating someone who she claims was physically and emotionally abusive. She claims that she felt threatened when he harassed her over the phone and social media and stalked her around her dorm.

The second incident involved a visit to a friend at a fraternity house on campus. According to the lawsuit, the alleged victim could not remember the time after entering the frat and waking up, upstairs. Groggy and extremely disoriented, she went to the emergency room. She decided that she had been sexually assaulted “based on how her body felt.”

When the Title IX officer heard the allegations, she allegedly tried steering the girl away from making a formal report, pointing out that a formal report could damage the reputations of the people she was trying to accuse.

So the alleged victim sued Michigan State.

Lawsuit Betrays a Disturbing Entitlement

Alleged victims of sexual assault often claim that they are not taken seriously when they report their experiences. This can be a problem because it deters reporting, which indirectly incentivizes sexual wrongdoing – when victims aren't believed from the onset, it insulates aggressors from responsibility and they act accordingly.

Fixing this problem was at the heart of the changes to Title IX law in the past decade. However, this lawsuit suggests that encouraging victims to come forward has given everyone who claims to be a victim a feeling of entitlement. Alleged victims demand to be taken seriously, even when there are signs that their claims should be disregarded.

This particular lawsuit, which is being filed by an alleged victim who is not hiding her name and demands financial compensation, rather than any changes to MSU's Title IX process. It was even reported in the news before Michigan State had been served with it. The two claims in it seem, even on their own terms, fairly weak: The first claims that MSU should pay for a bad dating relationship, while the second alleges a sexual assault but conspicuously does not provide medical documentation, even though the alleged victim went to the hospital.

A very real possibility is that the Title IX investigator heard her complaint and dissuaded her from filing a report because it was evident that there was nothing there. Now she's suing because she feels entitled to support, and demanding money because she didn't get it.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.