Blog

High School Taking Heat for Letting Accused Rapist Stay in School With Victim Until He Pled Guilty

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Oct 08, 2019 | 0 Comments

A high school student has pled guilty to raping a classmate, nearly a year after the alleged incident. During that delay, he was allowed to continue to attend school, sparking outrage from other students and the local community.

But with so little guidance from the federal level about how schools should handle sexual assault allegations and how to punish them under Title IX, situations like these should not come as a surprise.

High School Boy Rapes Classmate, Stays in School

The incident happened in the Niagara Wheatfield Senior High School in Sanborn, New York, a town of barely more than 1,500 to the north of Buffalo.

A male student there admitted to raping a classmate in her home at some point in the summer of 2018. The incident was not reported for a few months, but when it was the high school decided that the male student was entitled to an education pending the outcome of the criminal charges.

It was not until May 2019, that the student pled guilty to third-degree rape, a felony sex offense. A few days later, word of the guilty plea reached the school and they refused to let the student enter school property because he was a convicted felon.

For nearly the whole school year, though, the alleged victim and perpetrator were in the same classes and hallways, a situation that, according to the victim's mother, was incredibly traumatizing.

Hundreds of other students at the school had planned a walkout in support of the victim. The situation has led the school district to put the school's principal on administrative leave.

The male student has since been sentenced to one-year probation in order to earn a youthful offender status and have his background cleared.

A Lack of Uniformity and Preparedness at the High School Level

The underlying problem in situations like these is that the school district is put in an impossible position: If they had chosen to kick the male student out while his case progressed through the criminal court system, he would have been the one to press Title IX charges.

It's just one more example of how little uniformity there is when it comes to enforcing Title IX claims. District officials have to make judgment calls with very little guidance from Title IX regulations or precedent. With so few rules to look to, no matter what they do will get challenged from one side or the other.

To make matters worse, high schools in the U.S. have to deal with Title IX allegations less often than colleges do, leaving them even less prepared when one is made. That there are not more stories of incredible missteps like this one is what is truly shocking.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer who helps students accused of sexual assault in the education setting. He also serves as a national Title IX advisor to students facing Title IX charges. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges locally and nationwide while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu