A seemingly bottomless well of AI-powered resources has given students more power than ever—to create, get organized, and make the most of their educational opportunities. These resources have also created more opportunities for students to be accused of misconduct, and that opportunity certainly exists when they use Obsidian.

Dubbed the “free and flexible app for your private thoughts,” Obsidian takes note-taking and note-keeping to the next level. Users can not only store their notes securely in a single place (the Obsidian platform) but also use the platform to graph their notes, a feature that visual learners may love.

Students who need to maintain, organize, and utilize notes in virtually every aspect of their academic life are an obvious target demographic for those who created Obsidian. There are several conceivable ways to use the platform without violating traditional academic conduct policies.

However, there are also circumstances in which professors and university administrators might view a student’s use of Obsidian as misconduct. If you or your student is accused of such misconduct, call the LLF National Law Firm Student Defense Team at 888-535-3686 or contact us online.

We find favorable resolutions for students who face the prospect of discipline, which can irreparably tarnish their reputations and result in substantial harm, both immediately and in the future. Don’t wait to call us.

There Are Ample Ways for Students to Benefit from the Obsidian Platform

It only takes a brief review of Obsidian’s features to see how valuable the platform can be for students, and you might use Obsidian to:

  • Keep your notes, ideas, journals, and other written resources in one place: Many of the notes-centric AI platforms, including Obsidian, are valuable merely because they allow the user to keep their notes (and other written content) in a single place. Rather than having to keep track of a muddled Google Drive or switch between notebook paper and digital platforms like Microsoft Word, Obsidian is designed to store and manage all of a student’s notes in a single place.
  • Convert your notes into visual representations: Obsidian’s graphing feature allows the user to “visualize the relationship between your notes.” The graph resembles an interconnected constellation, and the interactive graph also allows users to easily click between related notes.
  • Publish your notes on online platforms: A student can publish their notes as an online wiki, an Obsidian Publish website, or in other formats, making those notes shareable. They can also customize the look of their published notes, which makes Obsidian a website-creating resource.
  • Utilize plugins to maximize the potential of Obsidian: Obsidian features an open-source framework that includes thousands of plugins. These plugins serve as additional features that a student might use to share their notes with other users, integrate YouTube data into their vault, upload images, or enhance their Obsidian experience in myriad ways.

For time immemorial, the quality and organization of a student’s notes have directly impacted their academic performance. This fact highlights why Obsidian is such an obvious resource for learners to utilize.

AI Platforms Like Obsidian Have Sparked Unprecedented Questions and Quandaries About What Constitutes Misconduct

While virtually anyone could see the value that AI platforms like Obsidian have to university students, professors are among the few groups that tend to view these matters more skeptically.

Deep-seated dynamics have hindered students’ ability to make the most of artificial intelligence, and we have witnessed firsthand how:

  • Professors’ default approach to AI resources like Obsidian is wariness: Due in large part to students using tools like ChatGPT to write their essays, professors have some understandable skepticism about AI resources as a whole. In fact, some professors have come to view the term “AI” as synonymous with “cheating.” This presents an uphill battle for students who need to explain or justify their use of completely justifiable platforms like Obsidian.
  • University employees often accuse before they understand: Not every professor is genuinely open to the idea that a student might use artificial intelligence without violating academic conduct policies. These professors might even file a formal grievance against a student without even attempting to understand what Obsidian is or how the student utilized the platform.
  • Students don’t always get the chance to explain AI resources (or how they use them): The proper approach is for a professor to speak with their student before alleging misconduct. However, students are not always granted the opportunity to explain themselves. Even if a student gets that opportunity, their professor might dismiss a valid explanation as “excuses” or attempt to minimize unacceptable behavior.
  • Once the disciplinary process starts, the student often loses control of the outcome: Disciplinary proceedings have a way of quickly spiraling out of the student’s control. Once an investigator frames circumstances through their own lens, or a disciplinary counsel forms its opinion about the situation, a student may no longer be able to influence the outcome.

The LLF National Law Firm Student Defense Team exerts our influence over disciplinary proceedings immediately, ensuring that the students we represent are never railroaded, deceived, or subject to punishments they do not deserve to suffer.

The LLF National Law Firm Is Students’ Staunchest Advocate

As soon as you even suspect that you might be accused of violating your school’s conduct policies, call our team. We will help you by:

  • Handling communications with your school’s representatives with the singular goal of enacting the best possible resolution for you
  • Speaking directly with your school’s legal counsel if circumstances call for that approach
  • Gathering your account of events, evidence, any relevant witness testimony, and any other assets to your defense
  • Documenting how you used Obsidian, which may be the most compelling feature of our defense efforts
  • Guiding you through every step of any formal disciplinary proceedings you face

Few firms are as dedicated to student defense as we are. When you speak with our team, we will provide more details about how we have helped other students and how we plan to help you or your student.

Call the LLF National Law Firm Student Defense Team at 888-535-3686 or contact us online.

AI Cheating Accusations

Tell About Your Case

The LLF National Law Firm Ensures a Title IX Investigation After a Student is Sexually Assaulted

The superintendent of a school district in Oregon has been charged with obstructing an investigation into sexual assault at a local high school, and the LLF National Law Firm’s Education Law Team is fighting on behalf of an elementary school student in the same district. That student, a third grader, […]

How DEI Rollbacks and Institutional Neutrality Can Bring Disciplinary Action for Students

For the past few years, colleges and universities across the United States have been reexamining their approach to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). In many cases, DEI offices are being scaled back or shut down altogether. At the same time, schools are rolling out new “institutional neutrality” policies, which are […]

Why It’s Risky to Wait to Get Help if Facing Disciplinary Action at University

When a student faces disciplinary action from their college or university, many families prefer to handle it on their own. They assume they can always hire legal help on appeal if the outcome is unfavorable. Unfortunately, that assumption can backfire badly. One of the least understood aspects of university disciplinary […]

New NCAA Legislation: Redefining the Stakes of Academic Misconduct

The NCAA’s head of enforcement has confirmed that academic misconduct is on the rise, with approximately 20 open investigations currently active across the country. As the collegiate landscape shifts due to the House v. NCAA settlement and the professionalization of the “student-athlete” role, a committee of university presidents is drafting […]