Those who graduate from UC Berkeley hold a ticket as golden as the precious metal so many once flocked to the state to mine. Yet students found responsible for academic misconduct can see their golden ticket reduced to fool’s gold. Prospective employers (and others whose favor graduates seek to curry) generally prefer those with unblemished records.

Following the university’s rules about the proper use of AI resources is critical for those who want to derive maximum value from their degree. Let’s discuss those policies, how students can knowingly or unknowingly violate them, and what you should do when accused of crossing the line that delineates acceptable from prohibited use of artificial intelligence.

First, a bit of advice: If you or your student is accused of improperly using AI in their studies, protect yourself by calling the LLF National Law Firm Student Defense Team now at 888-535-3686 or contacting us online.

UC Berkeley Has Rules About How Students Can Use AI. Here Are a Few of Them.

Though its nickname “Berzerkeley” might insinuate otherwise, Cal students are expected to abide by many rules. Those rules extend to the use of artificial intelligence in one’s academic work, and some school-wide guidance includes:

  • Only submitting publicly available information to AI platforms: Protecting sensitive data is a concern at most universities, including UC Berkeley. Students are forbidden from entering information that is not publicly available into their AI resources, which can be a tight clamp on how students use AI.

  • Avoiding other prohibited uses of artificial intelligence: These prohibited use cases include violating professors’ rules on AI use in academic work and refraining from any harassing or otherwise unethical conduct enabled by AI systems.

  • Sticking with Cal-sanctioned resources: The university “has license agreements for certain AI tools,” and students who use non-sanctioned resources may face a heightened risk of misconduct accusations.

To its credit, UC Berkeley offers students and professors educational resources that foster responsible, proper use of AI. This learning path highlights how both instructors and students have the shared responsibility to minimize the likelihood of AI-related misconduct accusations.

Know Thy Professor: Who Really Sets the Rules Around AI Use at Cal Berkeley?

UC Berkeley offers a quality of education that is truly a cut above the vast majority of schools in the United States. Yet, Cal is like most other colleges in the U.S. in requiring its instructors to establish their own AI-specific guidance. This approach makes sense because:

  • The nature of coursework is specific to each course, and some courses may be more conducive to AI resources than others

  • Professors differ in their perspectives on AI’s relative value and drawbacks, and those professors imbue those varying perspectives in their unique course policies

  • Policies that apply to an entire university (or even an entire department) are more difficult to tailor to the specifics of a particular course or assignment

  • When students have questions or concerns about using AI in their work, it is most practical and logical for them to speak with their professor, rather than track down the administrator(s) who crafted a university-wide policy

Berkeley’s policies are very clear in their mandate to professors: “We wish to remind faculty of their authority over courses and curriculum, and to make clear that academic expectations should be established in the course syllabus.”

So, How Should a Student Proceed Knowing AI Usage Policies Are Set by Instructors?

We know that you might already be facing an allegation of AI-related misconduct. If you are not, here are a few tips for reducing the likelihood of being accused:

  • Get a copy of your instructors’ written AI usage policies and examine them as if they were the study guide for a critical exam

  • Contact your instructor about any ambiguity in the policy (getting their response in writing can be useful if you are ever accused of violating the policy)

  • Ask your professor about any specific AI tools or use cases you are considering implementing

Even students who go the extra mile in protecting themselves from allegations of AI-related misconduct cannot guarantee they won’t be accused. However, you should do everything in your power to avoid the real danger that can arise from uncertainty and miscommunication regarding AI usage policies.

What’s the Adjudication Process for Alleged Academic Misconduct at UC Berkeley?

The worst has happened. You’ve been accused of misusing artificial intelligence, and your degree from UC Berkeley (and everything that degree will afford you) is flashing before your eyes.

Knowledge is power when a student is facing possible sanctions, so here is what you can expect from your school’s adjudication process:

  • The instructor either meets with the student or chooses not to: Just as instructors establish the guidelines for AI usage, they also decide whether to meet with a student they suspect of misusing AI. If they meet, the student has the chance to sign a Faculty Disposition Form and accept any discipline the instructor proposes during the meeting.

  • The Center for Student Conduct takes over the case: If your case reaches the Center for Student Conduct, you will likely face an investigation and a possible hearing regarding the accusation.

You should also have the chance to appeal any ruling that is overly punitive, not supported by the evidence, or one that results in severe discipline such as suspension or expulsion.

The school even provides an easy-to-follow flowchart detailing this process, as students facing the stress of a misconduct accusation shouldn’t have to search far and wide for this information.

Misconduct Allegations Can Take a (Stanford) Axe to Your Reputation. Here’s What You Stand to Lose.

The fallout from a finding of academic misconduct makes a loss to Stanford feel like no big deal—yes, it’s that serious. You might face dismissal, suspension, and a host of other disciplinary actions depending on the details of your case.

You may not feel the full weight of such discipline for years, when you look back and realize that you’ve lost countless opportunities because of the tarnishing effect of sanctions on your good name.

Our job is to ensure students’ hard-earned reputations and achievements are not dashed by severe sanctions. Call the LLF National Law Firm Student Defense Team now at 888-535-3686 or contact us online to discuss how we will protect and serve you.

California

Tell About Your Case

When the School Becomes the Problem: What UNC’s Botched Investigation Teaches Every Student

A University of North Carolina (UNC) student lost his scholarship and was permanently expelled from the entire UNC system after the school found him responsible for sexual misconduct. Years of federal litigation followed. And then, quietly, UNC settled. The former student, identified in court records as Jacob Doe, argued that […]

How a Cell Phone Policy Violation Can Escalate Into a Serious Disciplinary Issue

The cell phone bans sweeping the country’s K-12 schools in the last few years may sound good on paper—and educators overwhelmingly support them—but what do you do if what began as confiscation of your child’s phone has escalated into significant disciplinary action? The Student Defense Team at the LLF National […]

Taking a School District in WA to Court to Protect Students’ Title IX Rights

The LLF National Law Firm’s Education Law Team will be suing a school district in Washington state for its failure to meet its Title IX reporting obligations in the case of an elementary school student who claims they were bullied and sexually assaulted. The student, a third grader, now suffers […]

Questions About AI Use at One University Reflect Broader Concerns

A report from Montreal’s Concordia University that looks at student AI use over the 2025–2026 school year shows us a microcosm of the broader trends at work not just in Canada, but in the U.S. as well. Here’s what we’re seeing in the report: Students are using AI in their schoolwork — […]