An accused student is not necessarily presumed innocent in a university disciplinary proceeding. It depends on the school. Studies have been done, across the country, where the number of schools that actually don’t have a presumption of innocence is glaring. Often, people come to me, they come to me throughout the process, early on, during the process. They come to me after the fact, also, after they go through the process on their own or with someone not suited to the task. And when I can look back and see what happened or what shouldn’t have happened, one of the arguments that’s generally raised at that later stage is the fact that there’s no presumption of innocence against this accused student and that is such a fundamental right. So for a school not to have that, it puts an accused, potentially, at a tremendous disadvantage from the start. So the answer to that question is it does depend. It depends on the school.