Blog

Years of Alleged Misconduct Brought to Light: The Adjudication of Complex Cases

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Mar 03, 2021 | 0 Comments

Sexual misconduct cases are never cut-and-dry. They're complicated. They're multifaceted. They change people's lives.

When the misconduct in question took place over several years, however, a complex case can quickly become very challenging.

In the early ‘80s, an investigation into faculty misconduct at Harvard found one professor guilty of sexually harassing another. The official documentation included a note stating that if the accused “repeated the offense,” the school would recommend termination of the accused's professorial position.

A few years later, a student brought allegations forward against the same person.

Challenging Considerations in Long-Ranging Instances of Alleged Sexual Misconduct

Despite its documented intent, the school did not fire the twice-accused professor. Instead, the professor rose through the ranks at Harvard, ultimately attaining several prominent positions. The misconduct allegedly did not cease. By 2018, several more women had come forward to make further allegations of sexual assault.

It wasn't until 2019 that the University stripped the professor of his honors and his position. The Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences even banned the professor from campus.

Although this is a situation where a member of the school staff was at the center of the allegations, there are several considerations that - for better or for worse - apply to every modern case of collegiate sexual misconduct.

  • Time can confuse sexual misconduct cases. In long-ranging cases like these, the university environment can become a factor. People may wonder who (or what) is more at fault - the person at the center of the allegations or the so-called ‘permissive culture' that enables them to continue?
  • Past allegations of misconduct can factor into current adjudicative processes. Today, a disciplinary board will likely take into account the full scope of a person's alleged historical actions. However, that does not translate to definite guilt. At least one person involved in the Harvard case was aware of the entire story, but had “decided that [the professor] had reformed his ways, and that he should not be further punished for past misbehavior.”
  • The way in which a university shares and stores information is vastly important. Over the decades that this professor attained promotions, the school vetted him several times. However, the school didn't have a centralized location for personnel files. The committees looked in the wrong place and didn't see the concerning notes. Today, schools are more likely to have a fully-digitized, accessible record system—but the point still stands: Information is only as good as it is easily found.
  • Promised action does not always equal completed action. Even if a document states clear intent to act in a specific way, a human still needs to decide to follow-through on any implied or stated consequences. This implies that - even if your case has an on-record decision and disciplinary determination - you may still have a chance to work towards a positive outcome.

Rely on a Skilled, Experienced Student Defense Advisor to Guide You Through the Most Complex of Cases

Joseph D. Lento has unparalleled experience defending students and faculty who need a second chance. If you face accusations of sexual misconduct, call the Lento Law Firm today at 888-535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu