How Would Changing the Standards for Institutional Liability Help People Accused of Title IX Violations?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jan 06, 2020 | 0 Comments

One huge reason for the uptick in Title IX lawsuits that allege sexual misconduct on college campuses across the country is the potential for institutional liability. If an alleged victim of sexual assault can show that their school “reasonably should have” known about harassment or assault, and then failed to act appropriately.

The potential for winning money damages if such a vague standard can be shown has likely led to hundreds of Title IX claims against innocent students and faculty members.

Thankfully, upcoming changes to Title IX regulations are said to correct this problem.

The Current State of Institutional Liability for Title IX Violations

Under current Title IX law, colleges can be liable for a Title IX violation if they do not act appropriately to sexual misconduct that they “reasonably should” have known about. This standard is important because it means a college could be held liable for not preventing misconduct they were unaware of, or for not responding appropriately to an act that was never reported.

When actual knowledge of an event is not required, the big question becomes where the line is to be drawn. If there are signs that should've made a school aware of misconduct, what are those signs? And who at the school has to be aware of them?

These open-ended questions are a serious problem. Alleged victims can see them as an opportunity to press forward with a weak case – a decision that comes at the expense of the person they are accusing.

Changes to Title IX Regulations Rumored to Require Actual Knowledge

New amendments to Title IX's regulations are rumored to change that vague standard.

These are the same amendments that were proposed over a year ago and that attracted lots of attention during the notice and comment phase.

Based on the proposed regulation changes and reports of the soon-to-be-finalized versions of those changes, Title IX will soon require that a school have “actual knowledge” of misconduct for it to be held financially liable for not responding to it appropriately. While some critics claim that “actual knowledge” is a vague standard, it is far clearer than the constructive knowledge that is currently required.

Why Requiring Actual Knowledge Can Help the Accused

By raising the standard of proof from “reasonably should have known” to “actual knowledge,” Title IX can make it more difficult for alleged victims of sexual misconduct to recover financial compensation from their institutions. With the possibility of winning money from a college less attainable, we'll likely see fewer allegations of Title IX violations as those with weak, tenuous, or outright fraudulent claims. This means fewer innocent students, staffers, or faculty members will be accused of wrongdoing.

Title IX Defense Lawyer and National Title IX Advisor Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and a national Title IX advisor. If you have been accused of sexual misconduct on campus and are facing a Title IX investigation, you can contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.