When the Algorithm Cheats the Student

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jul 15, 2022 | 0 Comments

As online learning becomes the new normal, algorithm-based technology is an increasingly important tool for colleges to monitor cheating. Anti-plagiarism apps have long been used for written submissions, but the last year has seen an influx of schools embracing proctoring software, some of which co-ops students' webcams to record their activity during exams.

While innovative, there is a problem: it's not always accurate. This is nothing new. If algorithms were fool-proof, you'd be tempted to buy every product advertised on your social media feed.

Unfortunately, that hasn't stopped universities, such as Dartmouth College, from treating information obtained from these algorithms like a smoking gun. Once an exam has been flagged, instructors will often trust the conclusions without hesitation, leaving undeserving students facing consequences for academic misconduct.

Why Is This Kind of Algorithm Used?

Remote education has made cheating easier and more prevalent, and institutions are trying to find solutions that discourage dishonesty. Sending individual proctors to each student's home isn't realistic, so proctoring software is seen by most schools as the most effective option available.

The software (of which there are many competing brands) functions by monitoring activity during exams in a number of ways, including tracking visits to prohibited websites or by using facial recognition to study the student's eye movement. If the algorithm detects anything it considers abnormal (such as looking away from the screen), it triggers a red flag for educators to review.

Because the algorithm reacts to certain stimuli, false conclusions are possible and common. A person who stares into the distance while problem solving is just as likely to be flagged as a person blatantly reading the test's answers offscreen.

In most cases, the decision to pursue academic misconduct rests largely with the instructor. In short, the issue isn't necessarily with the algorithm itself, but with the educators' reactions (or overreactions) to it. The cheating that is found is usually assumed and not confirmed without a doubt. This means there is a lot of room for error.

If an algorithm accuses you of cheating, try not to panic. You have worked hard to be where you are now. Rather than accepting the punishment unchallenged, consider having an attorney help fight back.

The Lento Law Firm Offers Experienced Representation

Allegations of academic misconduct should always be taken seriously, regardless of their truthfulness. As with other forms of online cheating, consequences for algorithm-supported offenses typically range from suspension to full expulsion. These penalties can have a huge impact on your academic future and desired career. When there is so much at stake, it's always best to consult a professional in an attempt to reach the best resolution.

Highly-experienced attorney Joseph D. Lento specializes in student defense cases across the United States. He and his expert team have defended hundreds of students against academic misconduct accusations. You are not alone. Contact the Lento Law Firm via the online form, or call 888-535-3686 for a consultation.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.