Protest at Princeton Alumni Weekend's Title IX Panel Showcases Destructive Attitude of Many Victim Advocates

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jun 11, 2019 | 0 Comments

A walkout and protest at Princeton University's well-known alumni weekend served as a stark reminder that advocates for sexual assault victims care little for the due process concerns of anyone they accuse of sexual misconduct.

Princeton Alumni Weekend's Title IX Program Deteriorates in Walkout

Princeton University's alumni weekend festivities and programs are renowned for their keynote speakers, largely drawn from alumni, and school camaraderie. On a typical annual reunion, more than 25,000 alumni return to the campus to meet fellow classmates.

Central to this event is the alumni-faculty forums that delve into contemporary issues.

For the 2019 edition of Princeton's alumni weekend, which was held on the first weekend in June, one of those forums dealt with the #MeToo Movement and the procedures used to investigate and hear sexual harassment allegations.

On the panel were three Princeton alumni:

  1. Kellen Heniford, a Columbia University doctoral student
  2. Rachael Wong, the founder of the Hawaii nonprofit One Shared Future
  3. Beth Wilkinson, one of the founding partners of the Washington, D.C. law firm Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz

Ms. Heniford is a survivor of sexual violence.

Ms. Wilkinson is the attorney who defended Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Virginia Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax against allegations of sexual misconduct.

Ms. Heniford, rather than participate in the panel, read from a prepared statement to decry the decision to include Ms. Wilkinson in the discussion, saying, “I did not anticipate that the Alumni Affairs Office's version of ‘both sides' on the #MeToo issue would look like this — survivors and their defenders somehow pitted against a prominent defender of a prominent man accused of abuse.”

She then walked away from the panel, with several other attendees in tow.

The panel's discussion continued without them.

The One-Sided Reality of the #MeToo Movement

The incident, and particularly Ms. Heniford's quote, highlights how advocates for alleged victims of sexual abuse and harassment seem to think that they are entitled to a world that abides by their ideals, rather than an opportunity to have a meaningful dialogue that could shed light on the real problems of sexual assault and provide practical solutions.

Ms. Heniford had a written statement already prepared for the beginning of the panel – a statement that admitted that she knew the panel was supposed to be a discussion with people from “both sides” of the debate, and that she rejected it outright precisely because it would not be a rally by and for victim advocates like herself. This attitude – that dialogue is not worth having, and that outright capitulation to the demands of victim advocates is the only possible outcome – is at the heart of the problems with Title IX law. Due process concerns are irrelevant to them because they have bypassed the possibility that sexual misconduct allegations could possibly be vindictive and that the accused could actually be innocent.

National Title IX Advisor Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a national Title IX advisor who aims to fight that destructive attitude by being an advocate for those who have been accused of sexual misconduct and who are facing Title IX action. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.