University of Southern California Title IX Violations

The University of Southern California (USC) was established in 1880 and now has an overall student enrollment that exceeds 48,000. The institution is responsible for maintaining compliance with federal Title IX guidelines, which were established in 1972. These provisions were implemented to address concerns regarding sexually-based discrimination in educational institutions.

The Title IX Coordinator is located in Stonier Hall and is available via phone, email, or in person. Those who wish to file a complaint anonymously may do so electronically. USC now has substantial resources available for victims of sexual misconduct.

Potential Interim Measures

As the University undertakes the investigative process, it may implement interim measures intended to protect and support parties. Orders may be established that prohibit contact between opposing parties. Examples include modifications to educational scheduling and campus housing arrangements.

Rights and Protections

Some of the following rights and procedural protections that are granted to all parties include:

  • To be treated equally and fairly by trained investigators that are impartial
  • Provided with a written summary of all allegations and notifications of all proceedings
  • The ability to submit relevant evidence and identify potential witnesses
  • A live hearing forum where parties may be “indirectly cross-examined” and witness testimony is heard
  • The opportunity to appeal the findings

Role of Advisor

The Reporting Party (complainant) and the Respondent (accused) may choose an advisor. The advisor may be an individual that does not have any personal involvement or conflicting interests in the matter. This individual may support, assist, and help navigate the process.

The Hearing Process

USC has Evidence Hearing and Live Hearing options. An Evidence Hearing is held in the Title IX Office and overseen by the Title IX Coordinator and representation from those who investigated the matter. These are not used for cases where “severe disciplinary sanctions” are possible.

A Live Hearing is overseen by an adjudicator. Witnesses are cross-examined indirectly through moderators. The adjudicator may exclude questions that they believe to be confrontational or irrelevant. Statements delivered and responses to questions are often related to new evidence.

Sanctions or Penalties

The evidence is assessed and potential penalties are imposed by a Misconduct Sanctioning Panel of three individuals. Typically, the Panel is composed of two faculty members and one student. The Misconduct Sanctioning Panel deliberates privately. If the allegations are proven, the Respondent will likely face sanctions such as suspension or expulsion from the school.

Appeals Process

An Appellate Panel composed of three individuals appointed by the Vice President of Student Affairs is responsible for hearing appeals. Notice of intent to appeal must be submitted within five days. The appeals process involves reviewing only written evidence. Appeals may be permitted if new evidence has emerged that was not previously available.

They are also permitted when a party believes there was some error or deviation in the policy. Parties may also appeal the sanctions that were imposed if it is believed they are “grossly disproportionate” to the violation(s). Those pursuing an appeal should have assistance from an attorney. This is critical for drafting a compliant and effective written appeals documents.

Attorney for USC Students in Title IX Actions

The Lento Law Firm understands the potentially severe adverse ramifications that can result from allegations of sexual misconduct. We encourage you to contact the office today at (888) 535-3686 for a consultation.

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu