University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Title IX Violations

The University of Michigan (UM) is a nationally renowned institution located in Ann Arbor. The school remains compliant with the provisions of the federal Title IX guidelines. This was a U.S. Department of Education amendment implemented in 1972 to address concerns involving sexually-based discrimination in all educational settings.

Sexual and Gender-Based Misconduct Overview

UM summarizes their program of Title IX compliance according to four key goals as follows: 

  • To eliminate and prevent all acts of Prohibited Conduct
  • Ensuring that the entire UM community is “well-informed” regarding Prohibited Conduct
  • Handling all alleged complaints fairly and impartially
  • Clearly defining standards for proper evaluation and disciplinary action

The Title IX Coordinator and Deputy Title IX Coordinator are located within the Office for Institutional Equity in the Administrative Services Building. Other departments involved in these matters include the Office of Student Conflict Resolution (OSCR) and the Dean of Students Office (DOS). There are multiple options available for reporting complaints.

Support Person (Advisor)

Respondents are encouraged to choose a “support person or advisor” to accompany them to meetings. This individual may not be a witness in these matters.

Investigative Resolution vs. Adaptable Resolution

Adaptable resolutions are often called “alternative resolution” processes at other colleges and universities. This is a voluntary option for cases where the Respondent (accused) typically has accepted responsibility for the complaint. Adaptable resolution is not suitable for very serious violations such as sexual assault.

Investigative Resolution is the traditional approach that involves all parties attending a hearing. Hearings are held before a Review Panel that includes the Title IX Coordinator and other properly trained staff or faculty. Witness testimony may be heard; however, character witnesses are not permitted.

All parties are permitted to ask questions of the hearing officer, witnesses, and parties. Either party may also make closing statements.

Standard of Evidence

The standard of proof employed is by a preponderance of the evidence, which is “more likely than not.” Following a hearing, a written decision will be made within 14 days. If the allegations against the Respondent are proven, the individual will likely be suspended or dismissed from UM.

Those who are determined to have violated Title IX will have this information added to their student records. The University retains this information for seven years.

Appeals Process

The Claimant and Respondent are both eligible to pursue an appeal. The OSCR Associate Director must be notified in writing within seven days. The appeal involves submitting a written statement that explains the basis for the appeal in 10 pages or less. The opposing party may review and respond to an appeal.

Those seeking to appeal an adverse ruling must do so with assistance from a lawyer. This will better ensure that the written statement is compliant with all requirements and is persuasive.

Effective Legal Counsel for Students in Title IX Actions

Students who are alleged to have committed acts of sexual misconduct may be subject to the Title IX disciplinary process. Having a seasoned attorney that is familiar with these matters is critical. Contact the Lento Law Firm today at (888) 535-3686 for additional information. 

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.