Unfair Processes and New Title IX Hearing Committees

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Dec 01, 2020 | 0 Comments

A recent article in The Minnesota Daily (the newspaper for the University of Minnesota) discussed the formation of a new committee called the Sexual Misconduct Hearing Committee. Similar committees are being created throughout the nation to address what many consider an unfair Title IX process for reviewing alleged cases of sexual misconduct perpetrated by students, staff, or faculty. Numerous individuals state that process used by universities does not meet the typical court standards of due process or fair treatment and procedures that one would expect from a US court. As a result, the Trump Administration made numerous changes to this process, which became effective in August 2020.

Who will serve on this new committee?

The new Sexual Misconduct Hearing Committee at UMN and other schools throughout the nation will be comprised of University community members. UMN plans to have 36 members of the committee. People had to apply to participate in the committee. The review criteria for who is selected are not clear, creating one area of concern. Community members joining a committee like this could be biased against those accused of misconduct, and appropriate questioning would be necessary in order to remove those with bias or conflicts of interest. In addition, these community members' educational and professional background will be critical for determining whether these committees are likely to review cases fairly. For example, strong advocates for individuals claiming sexual misconduct may be biased in their assessment of cases. These are issues that apply to other universities too.

How will this committee be administered by UMN?

The management of the 36-person committee at UMN will be a challenge and will likely take time to manage well. UMN plans to have panels of five people serving in each live or virtual hearing. Using five instead of six members means that at least two people (perhaps more) will fluctuate around to two committees or alternate in one committee. Either way, the selection of five people will cause some disruption since there are a total of 36 people available. UMN will have a chair for each committee. According to the Title IX coordinator for UMN, the chair will likely be a person with previous professional experience. Experience in what fields is not clear. The chair will also receive a stipend. The role of the chair is to make sure the hearings have the appropriate decorum and are humane. These tasks will likely require special training. Also, while UMN may not intend to create a structure that is unfair, placing one person in the power position may lead to unintended consequences. This person could have a background that leads the person to favor one side or another – such as a lawyer with a history of representing people alleging misconduct.

The other committee members will be volunteers. Collectively, they will all make decisions about whether the sexual misconduct occurred or not in violation of University policy. If these individuals are not appropriately trained or if there are great disparities in their knowledge of how to fairly review cases like this, decisions may be inconsistent within and across the five-person panels. This may spell big problems for students accused of wrongdoing.

Highly Skilled and Experienced in Title IX Cases: The Lento Law Firm Can Help

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of Title IX disciplinary action or other negative sanction, you surely have feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold. Attorney Joseph D. Lento has helped countless students across the United States fight and win Title IX cases. Contact the Lento Law Firm today at 888-535-3686, and let us help secure your academic career.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.