UMass Boston Student Misconduct Defense

The University of Massachusetts (UMass) at Boston provides students with a worthwhile education to begin a successful career. While students juggle a heavy courseload, extracurricular activities, and social connections, they must also understand the school's conduct code. Student obligations at UMass Boston are wide-ranging, from residence hall rules and appropriate computer network use to respectful group conduct and upholding academic integrity.

Even a minor mishap or a first-time violation can land students in serious trouble. Despite procedures used to adjudicate allegations, those accused don't always get the impartiality they deserve. Students may think mounting a defense is a daunting prospect, but they have the opportunity to gain the counsel and guidance they need to protect their graduation goals.

The Lento Law Firm Student Defense Team is ready to begin your defense against misconduct allegations. Our team has the resources you need to protect your academic and professional future. Call us at 888-535-3686 now or visit our confidential consultation form, and we will reach out to you.

How Does UMass Boston Define Misconduct?

UMass Boston has disciplinary provisions that restrict and sanction different forms of misconduct. For instance, academic, behavioral, sexual, and harassment-based misconduct.

The university dedicates a large portion of its conduct code to listing prohibited behaviors that constitute violations. Although the list is extensive, it's not exhaustive or inclusive of all behaviors that will garner discipline. Nevertheless, the following are subject to the UMass Boston grievance process:

  • Acts of dishonesty, such as forgery, misrepresentation, and document alterations
  • Disruptive behavior that obstructs university activities
  • Threats or actual physical assault, abuse, harassment, or other harmful behaviors
  • Creating an intimidating, offensive, or hostile academic or working environment
  • Failure to abide by the university's alcohol policy or its drug-free policy
  • Possessing, storing, carrying, or using of any weapon, ammunition, or explosive
  • False reporting of fire, bombs, or other emergency situations (sometimes known as "swatting")
  • Lewd or indecent conduct, such as public urination, public defecation, streaking, stripping, or solicitation
  • Theft or unauthorized use or possession of property, resources, or services
  • Failure to maintain a hygienic living and learning environment
  • Attempted or actual use of electronic devices to invade a person's privacy

Anyone may file a misconduct report—students, teachers, administrators, and community members. The Office of the Dean of Students will determine if the complaint alleges a potential conduct code violation and will notify the accused (respondent) within five business days.

UMass Boston Misconduct Grievance Process

If the Office of the Dean of Students substantiates a potential violation, it assigns a Conduct Officer to the case. Both the officer and the respondent will meet in an Administrative Conference. This conference is an informal resolution to the disciplinary process. Those who admit responsibility to the allegations and forego formal measures waive the right to appeal.

If students wish to defend against the allegations in a formal hearing, UMass Boston proceeds with a full investigation through an Administrative Review. During formal proceedings, respondents, alleged victims, and accusers (complainants) each have the right to submit a written account or present testimony regarding the incident. Moreover, they may retain an advisor to assist them in any conduct meetings.

During the course of their investigation, Conduct Officers may seek the following information about respondents:

  • Communications related to the incident (emails, phone calls, text messages)
  • Information stored on personal electronics (photos, videos, network activity)
  • Testimony from campus community members
  • Previous disciplinary records

After the investigation, the Conduct Officer will meet with the respondent to review the findings. They will present findings based on a preponderance of evidence, a determination of responsibility, and additional pertinent notes. If the Conduct Officer levies responsibility, they will review the recommended sanctions.

Students have five business days to respond to the findings. They may also submit a "community impact statement" in support of their claims. Within ten business days, the Administrative Review Committee (ARC) evaluates the report and the parties' responses to its findings and issues a determination of responsibility.

In cases where sanctions may include suspension or expulsion, ARC holds an in-person hearing. During proceedings, ARC poses questions to the respondent, complainant, and any witnesses involved. Additionally, the complainant and respondent may submit questions to ARC for it to ask of the other party. ARC then adjourns to deliberate on a determination.

Misconduct Sanctions and Appeals Process

Respondents are notified of the findings and discipline, if any, in an emailed letter three days after deliberation. Students found responsible are assigned sanctions based on a myriad of factors, including their academic transcript, disciplinary history, community impact statements, and the Conduct Officer's recommended sanctions.

While ARC levies discipline on a case-by-case basis, UMass Boston asserts the following are used to address first-time violations of misconduct:

  • Underage possession or consumption of alcohol: written warning and parental notification for students under 21
  • Failure to comply with university officials: written warning, educational programs, and 16-week disciplinary probation
  • Property destruction: financial restitution and 32-week disciplinary probation
  • Hazing: suspension and 32-week disciplinary probation or expulsion

Students may file an appeal of ARC's decision within five business days. Requests are limited to a review of the investigation report and review findings. Only new evidence and significant procedural errors are grounds for appeal review.

If the UMass Boston appellate body upholds the appeal, the matter is referred back to ARC for reconsideration. It may also modify the sanctions imposed. Afterward, the matter is considered final and binding.

UMass Boston Students Need the Lento Law Firm Student Defense Team

Students may believe that they can manage misconduct allegations on their own. However, even a single mistake during the grievance process can leave them vulnerable to harsh discipline. Fortunately, they have an opportunity to gain the professional assistance they need to remain aligned with their academic and professional goals.

The Lento Law Firm Student Defense Team stands prepared to begin your defense against UMass Boston misconduct allegations. We will serve as your trusted advisor throughout the student conduct process, ensuring you exhaust all avenues of redress against charges. We coach students on how to respond to ARC's procedures and are dedicated to the most beneficial outcome. Call the Lento Law Firm Student Defense Team at 888-535-3686 now or visit our confidential online consultation form, and we will contact you.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu