Title IX Under the Biden Administration - Part 1

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Feb 15, 2021 | 0 Comments

It's no secret that the national political parties and candidates hotly contested the latest presidential election. The hot-button, sharply contested issues aren't just on immigration, policing, sexual identity, and Israel. The nation's wide political divide exists just as much in the interpretation of Title IX law, under which colleges and universities decide sexual-misconduct cases. And as election winners often remind us, elections have consequences. Winners rule, while losers go home.

So, what's likely to happen to Title IX under the Biden Administration? One thing seems sure: the transition from a Trump Administration to the Biden Administration is not likely to be a case of the more things change, the more they stay the same. Expect instead that federal Title IX regulations will change. We may not see broad legislative reform but are very likely to see significant regulatory changes. Expect colleges and universities to step back from the procedural protections that they just adopted last year under the last year's new federal regulations. This three-part blog series will explore what may come.

First, though, in this entry, understand where Title IX interpretation is now and what that means to those whom colleges and universities accuse of sexual misconduct.

Where Are We Now? Colleges and universities receiving federal funds must enforce Title IX's prohibition against sex discrimination consistent with administrative regulations. A 2011 Obama Administration Dear Colleague Letter expanded Title IX's prohibited forms of sexual misconduct, adding protections for the accuser that some court decisions found so strict as to violate the accused's constitutional rights. The Trump Administration rescinded that Dear Colleague Letter while tightening Title IX's sexual-misconduct definition again and adding protections for the accuser and accused. Read more here about those recent Title IX interpretive changes.

The current federal interpretation, still in place but likely to change under the Biden Administration, limits Title IX's reach to only these three forms of sexual misconduct: sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, or stalking; quid-pro-quo harassment (attempting to trade favors for sex); and unwelcome conduct so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive as to deny equal access to education based on sex.

Just as significantly, effective in August 2020, new Trump Administration Title IX regulations guaranteed the student accused of sexual misconduct a hearing at which the accused has the right to attend with an attorney-advisor to cross-examine the accuser and other witnesses to expose false allegations. The factfinder at that hearing may find Title IX sexual misconduct only on clear and convincing evidence, which is a higher burden of proof than the former preponderance-of-the-evidence standard. The new regulations clearly provide better protection for the accused.

Retain Expert Representation. You can see how under the current law and interpretations, expert representation by national academic attorney Joseph D. Lento of the Lento Law Firm can help you successfully defend against false or exaggerated sexual-misconduct allegations. School sexual-misconduct charges can end an education and ruin a reputation. Cross-examination of adverse witnesses and other advocacy like organizing and presenting evidence, challenging proposed findings, and appealing adverse findings can change the outcome of sexual-misconduct charges. Retain the expert representation of Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm if you face sexual-misconduct allegations. Call 888-535-3686 to schedule a consultation, or use the online service.

And that is where things stand now, at the outset of the Biden Administration. The next entry discusses what the changes are likely to be, but these are the current interpretations that are most likely to change under the Biden Administration:

  • Title IX's strict, limited, and objective definition of sexual misconduct;
  • the accused's right to attend a formal hearing to confront the accuser;
  • the accused's right for counsel to cross-examine opposition witnesses; and
  • the higher clear-and-convincing-evidence burden for proving misconduct.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.