The Facts About Title IX

Title IX, a landmark federal law passed in 1972, was initially aimed at eliminating gender discrimination in US educational programs, especially in athletics. However, its scope and application have significantly expanded over the decades, leading to convoluted interpretations and reinterpretations of the law--and, at times, unintended consequences. Originally celebrated for its role in promoting gender equality in sports, Title IX has evolved to become a central focal point requiring K-12 schools, colleges, and universities to address allegations of sexual misconduct and administer swift discipline--not just targeting school staff or employees, but students, as well. This evolution has brought about numerous challenges, including the unfortunate reality that many students now find their academic careers unjustly derailed by accusations of sexual misconduct, often without the typical means to defend themselves or to be afforded due process--all because schools are fearful of losing their federal funding if they don't comply.

If you are a student accused of sexual misconduct under Title IX policies--or the parent of an accused student--it's essential to learn the facts about Title IX in order to ensure student rights are protected. One key right you have is the right to legal counsel, even in situations where attorneys aren't directly allowed to interact. An experienced education law attorney may very well be the key to protecting your reputation, your academic journey, and even your career. The Student Defense Team at the Lento Law Firm has extensive nationwide experience assisting students accused of wrongdoing under Title IX. We know the law and the current rules concerning it, and we have a long track record of helping to resolve even the most complicated Title IX disputes. To schedule an appointment, call The Lento Law Firm at 888-535-3686 or fill out our online form.

Origins of Title IX

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 was introduced to combat sex-based discrimination in federally funded education programs and activities. The core text of Title IX states: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." Initially, the primary focus was to ensure women received equal opportunities in athletics and other educational areas traditionally dominated by men. This legislation ushered in an era of increased female participation in school sports, revolutionizing gender equality in education.

Interpretations and Reinterpretations of the Law

Over the past 50 years, the enforcement and interpretation of Title IX have broadened considerably as virtually every presidential administration has sought to bring its own sense of clarity to the law. For example, during the Obama administration, a pivotal moment arrived with the issuance of the 2011 "Dear Colleague" letter, which significantly altered the handling of sexual misconduct allegations. Schools were directed to believe accusers by default and to adopt a "preponderance of the evidence" standard, meaning that if it was more likely than not that misconduct occurred, the accused could be found responsible. This lowered the burden of proof, aiming to protect victims but also raising concerns about due process for the accused.

Conversely, the Trump administration's 2020 Final Rule sought to address these concerns by implementing stronger procedural protections for the accused, including the right to a live hearing and cross-examination. These changes aimed to balance the scales, ensuring that both complainants and respondents received fair treatment.

Recent Changes in Title IX Rules

In April 2024, the Biden administration approved an expansive set of new Title IX rules, set to take effect on August 1, 2024. These regulations reflect a basic return to Obama-era interpretations of the law. A few of the key changes include, but are not limited to:

  • Expanded Definitions: The definition of sex discrimination now explicitly includes sex-based harassment, sexual orientation, gender identity, and discrimination based on pregnancy or related conditions, among others.
  • Enhanced Protections: The rules extend protections to transgender students and pregnant students, emphasizing nondiscrimination.
  • Broader Jurisdiction: Schools' authority now covers off-campus and international incidents, reflecting the need to address misconduct beyond immediate institutional boundaries.
  • Lowered Evidentiary Requirements: Where the Trump administration applied the "clear and convincing evidence standard" to Title IX cases, the new rules restore the "preponderance of the evidence standard" of the Obama era, making it more difficult for the accused to defend themselves.
  • Return to the Single Investigator Model: Under the Trump administration, accused students have the right to a live hearing model with cross-examination. The new rules revert back to a single-investigator model where one person can be responsible for investigating, answering questions, and ultimately determining responsibility.

While these updates enhance protections for vulnerable groups, they also add layers of complexity to compliance efforts for educational institutions. They also have removed some key rights from accused students, increasing the risk that their due process rights will be violated.

The Problem with Title IX and Student Discipline

One of the most contentious aspects of Title IX enforcement is how schools handle sexual misconduct cases. With the risk of losing federal funding looming over them, institutions are incentivized to investigate all accusations thoroughly and often pursue charges aggressively. This places schools in a challenging position where they must act as accusers, investigators, and judges – roles traditionally separated in criminal justice systems to maintain impartiality.

The inherent conflict of interest in this arrangement can lead to biased proceedings. Schools may feel pressured to find students responsible for misconduct to demonstrate compliance with Title IX mandates, sometimes at the expense of fair and just outcomes. This situation has resulted in numerous cases where students' academic lives are disrupted by what they perceive as unfair disciplinary processes.

What to Do if You Are Accused of a Title IX Violation

Being accused of a Title IX violation is a serious matter that requires prompt and strategic response. The actions you take in the first few days and weeks after an accusation can significantly impact your academic future and potentially lead to criminal charges. If you find yourself under Title IX investigation, it is critical to seek legal counsel from an experienced education law attorney who understands the complexities of Title IX rules and can work within the current guidance to make sure your rights are protected.

The Lento Law Firm's Student Defense Team has a long, successful track record of defending students facing Title IX allegations nationwide. Our team stays up to date with the ever-changing landscape of Title IX laws and regulations so that our clients receive the best possible guidance and defense. We understand the stress, worry, and fear that come with a Title IX investigation, and we are here to guide and support you through every step of the process. To schedule a consultation, call us at 888-535-3686 or complete our online form.

Updated June 2024

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu