Blog

How Regulations by the Department of Education Fill the Gaps in Title IX Law

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 12, 2019 | 0 Comments

Anyone who is researching Title IX or has been accused of sexual misconduct on a college campus in the U.S. has come face-to-face with the often confusing regulatory system. Understanding how regulations are made and how they work is essential if you are dealing with Title IX allegations and want to know your rights.

Congress and Title IX

Congress is comprised of the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. It is the government body that creates laws.

One of those laws is Title IX, which was passed in 1972. However, that law is rather scant: All that it says is “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”

Rather than flesh out the law and outline what was prohibited, Congress punted the issue to the executive agency that would be responsible for enforcing the law, the Department of Education.

The Department of Education's Title IX Regulations

Part of punting responsibility to the Department of Education involved Congress giving the agency power to promulgate regulations that laid out the details for complying with Title IX, and even altering the very requirements of the law.

For example, one of the early regulations that the Department of Education passed was 34 CFR § 106.31(b)(5), which used to prohibit sexual discrimination in federally-funded education systems “in the application of codes of personal appearance.” While the text of the Title IX law said nothing about dress codes in school, the Department of Education decided to make Title IX's edicts apply to them.

These regulations have the same legal effect that statutes passed by Congress have, though they are far easier to change: In 1982, the Department of Education changed course on the dress code issue and rescinded 34 CFR § 106.31(b)(5).

The breadth and scope of an agency's regulations are only bound by the law that enables them. In the case of the Department of Education, Title IX allows the agency to create and enforce any regulation whatsoever, so long as it has to do with sexual and gender discrimination in the field of education.

Problems with the Regulatory System

Authorizing federal agencies to create their own rules and regulations so they can enforce vague Congressional laws has been a common tactic in the past few decades in America. However, the flexibility that it creates is not without controversy or its set of downsides.

One of the most important downsides has been that agencies in the executive branch are woefully prone to political movements, leading to wide swings in policies that drastically alter how certain laws are enforced. The current upheaval in Title IX law is just one example: While the executive branch was controlled by President Obama, Title IX was construed to help alleged victims of sexual abuse, assault, or misconduct on college campuses. Since President Trump has taken control of the executive branch, his appointees have shifted the concerns of Title IX back towards the due process rights of those who have been accused of misconduct.

Joseph D. Lento: Title IX Defense and Advisor

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and national Title IX advisor. You can contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686 for legal help and guidance.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. In various capacities, the Lento Law FIrm Team can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu