Title IX and the Clery Act: Similarities and Differences

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 28, 2018 | 0 Comments

In the wake of empowering anti-sexual assault movements like #MeToo and “Time's up”, victims have initiated public conversation about the serious issues affecting their daily lives, both personal and professional. The movements have successfully compelled women (who are disproportionately affected by sexual assault) and other demographics to garner the courage to expose their perpetrators, as they are now assured that a whole network of people are listening to their stories, and will believe them.

This cultural shift has become palpable in a number of industries. One of the most controversial settings where sexual assault has become increasingly prevalent is on college campuses. It seems like every week there's a new headline about a student enduring some form of sexual misconduct. While the details of each incident vary, the spirit of the laws implemented and enforced to deter sexual violence and gender-based discrimination are essentially the same. When it comes to the resolution of complaints involving these forms of misconduct, people generally reference two federal laws: Title IX and the Clery Act.

Title IX vs. The Clery Act

Most people are aware of Title IX in the context of equality in campus intercollegiate sports. Because of the application of this law, female athletes have access to a proportionate rate of athletic scholarships in comparison with their male counterparts. Title IX has just recently been referenced for sexual misconduct due to the OCR's implementation of more comprehensive sexual violence guidelines in 2011. It prohibits any form of sexual misconduct on campus by permitting schools to resolve complaints of this nature

Sharing the same morale as Title IX, the Clery Act is a consumer protection law that's intended to improve transparency in collegiate settings. In compliance with this law, colleges and universities must make statistics of campus crime and the efforts made to improve campus safety accessible to the public.


Institutional obligations

Both Title IX and the Clery Act obligate institutions to be proactive in their approaches to dealing with incidents of sexual violence of sex discrimination. In previous years, the enforcement of these laws were housed within a single department. For example, Title IX matters would solely be handled the campus civil rights office, while the enforcement of the Clery Act was perceived as only a concern for campus police or the office of security. In reality, when institutions properly comply, these laws have wide-reaching education, prevention, and resolution components that require campus-wide collaboration.



Title IX and the Clery Act each have very unique processes for investigations, protections, and remedies. Allegations for sexual harassment under Title IX may offer protections and arrangements for student respondents that the Clery act doesn't offer, and vice versa.

Title IX Advisor Helping Students Nationwide

If you've been accused of violating Title IX at your college or university, you need to get in contact with a skilled student defense attorney. Joseph D. Lento has extensive experience helping students nationwide in your situation overcome their allegations by helping them build a solid defense. He has the skill, experience, and expertise to help you do the same. If you have questions about your case, or want to know more about him or his firm, contact him online or give him a call at 888-535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.