Blog

Is Title IX a Factor in Primary and Secondary Schools?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Mar 11, 2019 | 0 Comments

If a school's Title IX obligations are tied to its federal funding, then does that mean that other, non-collegiate schools like high schools and elementary schools are tied to Title IX's rules and procedures, as well?

The answer is yes because primary education also receives a limited amount of federal funding. However, there is also far less controversy surrounding Title IX in the primary education setting, not only because sexual misconduct is considered less acceptable in high school and elementary school, but also because the control exerted over students makes allegations less uncertain and often reduces an accused student's due process concerns.

The Federal Funding that Triggers Title IX Regulations in Primary Education

Most of the federal funding for education goes to colleges and universities. However, some still get sent to elementary and secondary schools in the U.S., mostly through grants from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) to cover the costs of programs and facilities for low-income families. The ESEA was reauthorized by the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act.

Through these programs and others, the federal government is responsible for approximately 8% of the budget for primary and secondary schools in the U.S. – funds that come with strings attached, including the requirements imposed by Title IX to strictly enforce a school's prohibition against sexual harassment and misconduct.

The Negative Perception of Sexual Misconduct Before College

However, these strings are not necessarily as onerous for primary and secondary schools, largely because of the different perception that sexual misconduct has in them. While college students are sexually active adults who are deemed capable of making their own decisions and mistakes, younger students have far more rules hanging over them. Committing sexual misconduct is generally seen to break those rules, so vigorous enforcement of a school's policies against sexual misconduct is far less controversial in the setting of primary and secondary education.

More Control Over Students Means Fewer Due Process Concerns

Furthermore, high schools and elementary schools are run far more rigidly than colleges. While college students live on their own – with many even living off campus – and control the vast majority of their own time, students in elementary and high schools have very little independence. As a result, in many instances, there may be someone monitoring their actions that can help to prove or disprove an allegation of sexual assault or misconduct.

That is not to say that Title IX issues never come up outside of the collegiate setting. In fact, one of the leading Title IX cases, Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, involved fifth graders. It just means that most of the discussion centers around what types of action constitute sexual misconduct, rather than what actually took place. This drastically reduces the due process concerns of the accused student in primary or secondary school, as they rarely face repercussions from allegations that are completely unsupported.

Joseph D. Lento: National Title IX Advisor and Lawyer

Joseph D. Lento is a national Title IX advisor and defense attorney who legally represents those who have been accused of sexual misconduct. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website.  In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County.  In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County,  In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties.  Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law.  The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship.  The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu