The Use of Experts in Title IX Proceedings

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 16, 2018 | 0 Comments

Being accused of sexual misconduct at a college or university is one of the most stressful situations one can be in, especially if said student genuinely believes that they are innocent. These accusations turn a student's entire college experience upside down. In light of accusations and prior to a determination of guilt or innocence, acquaintances, friends, and society feel compelled to take sides in this debacle.

The reality of Title IX proceedings in institutions is, that for accused students, they can seem incredibly unfair. It resembles that of a witch hunt, rather than a proceeding that entitles due process under federal law. The fact that an accused student in a college proceeding has far fewer rights than they would if they were involved a criminal trial accusations of the same conduct doesn't make the situation any better.

For example, in college proceedings, the opportunity for an accused student to challenge the statements of an accuser through direct cross-examination or any other means of confrontation is not permitted. There are also no rules of evidence that could be applied in a school sexual misconduct case that protects an accused student from the submission of irrelevant or unjustified evidence.

An accused student's right to submit their own evidence in these cases, however, has aided in leveling the playing field. This is a big opportunity for said students to utilize one of the greatest resources in sexual misconduct cases: experts.

In Title IX proceedings, an expert is not required to testify, will not be subject to a determination of qualification, will not partake in cross-examination and will not have evidence challenged by the other party. An accused student is able to merely submit a report drafted by an expert, and have the expert's findings considered in the process of making a determination and recommending sanctions.

An accused student may want to submit evidence from experts for multiple purposes. Perhaps, the accuser acquires photos from an incident that they claim you caused in a certain way. The accused could have a doctor examine these photos, and use their expertise to invalidate these claims by determining that the injuries were not sustained the way the accuser claims, or that the injuries don't match the date or time of the incident. The accused may want to use the expertise of another expert, like a forensic psychologist, for example, to identify concerns about the mental health of the accuser, or as an explanation for inconsistencies in an accuser's account of events.

Some accused students have taken a more defensive route when utilizing their rights to an expert by taking a polygraph exam proving that they are telling the truth. A student may also take a psychosexual evaluation to establish that they display tendencies that are low risk when it comes to committing a sexual offense.

The only way to prevail in these flawed proceedings is to proactively defend yourself, and defend yourself well. This includes identifying the rights experts that will help you in your case, and obtaining reports from these experts within the relatively short investigation period.

Student Defense Attorney Helping Clients Nationwide

If you have been accused of sexual misconduct at your school, it's important you take advantage of the few rights that are entitled to you in proceedings. As indicated above, experts can help even the playing field in your case. For more information on experts, and representation that can help you identify the right experts in your case, contact skilled defense attorney Joseph D. Lento. He's helped students in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and nationwide overcome these charges, and he can do the same for you. Contact him today for help.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.