Blog

The Standard of Proof in a Title IX Case

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 26, 2018 | 0 Comments

In every Title IX proceeding, parties are required to adhere to evidentiary standards. These guidelines dictate which party is responsible for presenting enough evidence that proves or defeats a particular claim, and the amount of this evidence that is necessary to accomplish either a responsible or irresponsible finding. The appropriate standard of proof in Title IX cases, specifically involving sexual assault and other forms of sexual misconduct, has been hotly debated for years.

Under Obama-era Title IX guidance, a standard known as “the preponderance of evidence” was customary. A finding made based on the preponderance of evidence in the context of Title IX matters signifies that either the complainant or the respondents have proved that their version of facts, causes, or fault is more than likely what actually occurred. Imagine a scale representing the burden of proof, with the entirety of evidence from each party resting on respective trays on each side of the scale. If the scale even slightly tips to one side or the other, the side with the most weight will prevail. Also, if the scale does not tip towards the side of the complainant, they will not prevail.

It was perceived that the preponderance of evidence was the most appropriate for student conduct proceedings because of its seemingly equitable nature. However, with the entire revamping of the Title IX process in the wake of the Trump administration, colleges and universities now have the option of adopting the “clear and convincing” evidence standard.

The clear and convincing standard requires complainants to prove that there is a high probability that a particular fact is true - a higher threshold than the preponderance of evidence standard. (Both of these standards are lower than “beyond a reasonable doubt,” which is used in criminal cases). For due process advocates, the choice to opt for an alternative standard of proof is a victory. They have asserted time and time again that the preponderance time is too low to apply to the intricate and circumstantial nature of sexual misconduct cases. Either way, schools feel an immense amount of pressure whether they keep their policies intact in the midst of new rules, or modify their regulations.

It's important that student respondents understand what standard their school applies in Title IX proceedings. Knowing this information will help you prepare, and ultimately give you leverage in your case. Check your student handbook to understand your school's processes of resolving Title IX matters, and to confirm which evidence standard has been adopted in these processes.

Title IX Advisor Helping Clients Nationwide

Sexual misconduct allegations are a big deal and should be treated as such. If you value the investment you've made into your education, retaining a student defense attorney is a must. National Title IX attorney Joseph D. Lento has dedicated his entire career to helping students in this predicament prevail in hearing and overcome their charges. He can do the same for you. For more information about his representation or for a case evaluation, contact him online or give him a call at 888-535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu