Blog

The Hurdles of Suing a Public School in Sexual Misconduct Cases

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Aug 26, 2022 | 0 Comments

Schools should be a safe place for students, but as we all know, they often aren't. When something bad happens to a student at school, students and parents should be able to sue the school if that school contributed to the harm. Unfortunately, legal recourse can be difficult because public schools are afforded certain immunities under laws like Pennsylvania's Political Subdivision Torts Claim Act (“PSTCA”).

The PSTCA provides public school's strong immunities from tort litigation brought by private citizens, meaning those who've been harmed by a school's negligence or recklessness often have no recourse against the school. In the last few years, however, amendments to the PSTCA have leveled the playing field in a way that gives students and parents more opportunities for justice.

A New Exception Helps Victims Overcome the PSTCA

Statutes like the PSTCA can be helpful in preventing frivolous lawsuits, but what happens when a school's negligence leads to a student's harm? This is often the case when a student becomes the victim of sexual misconduct. In some cases, students are harmed by school personnel, and sometimes they're harmed by other students. In 2019, Pennsylvania lawmakers changed the PSTCA so that those harmed by sexual abuse can more easily bring a lawsuit against public school districts when the school failed to prevent the harm.

The law's amendments aren't offered carte blanch, and in order to effectively utilize the new changes to the PSTCA, the sexual abuse victim must be able to prove:

  • The school's omissions or acts were negligent and resulted in injuries to the plaintiff

The 2019 amendment to the PSTCA may signal a shift in policy priorities in the wake of the Me Too movement and high-profile cases of sexual assault on campus. Jurisdictions throughout the country have laws like the PSTCA, and it's likely that similar exceptions will also arise within those states.

Speak to an Experienced Student Defense Attorney Today

Sexual abuse cases can be difficult to prove, and each case is fact specific. The success of a lawsuit against a school for injuries related to sexual abuse will depend on state laws and court interpretation of those laws. In addition to cases that play out in civil court, the college or university involved will administer its own disciplinary proceedings.

If you're involved with a sexual abuse claim at your school, you need to speak with an experienced attorney-advisor who can help you understand what to expect from your school. It's always important to have your own advocate in disciplinary proceedings because there's absolutely no doubt that the school and parties adverse to you will have theirs. Contact the LLF Law Firm to learn how he and his dedicated team can help you today. Call 888-535-3686 or contact us online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. In various capacities, the Lento Law FIrm Team can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu