The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Required Anti-Sexual Harassment Training

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Sep 05, 2021 | 0 Comments

Schools Move Toward Anti-Sexual Harassment Training

A recent article in the University of South Carolina's Daily Gamecock online student newspaper reports that beginning in the Fall of 2021, mandatory anti-sexual harassment training “will be a regular requirement for faculty, staff and students….” The article cites an email from the university's interim president, summarizing the actions the school will take to respond to more than a thousand reports of campus sexual violence or harassment in the most recent five-year reporting period. The article credits the school's Title IX Task Force with galvanizing action and a Title IX Implementation Group with carrying actions out. Mandatory training represents a trend. Harvard University began requiring students to complete an anti-sexual harassment training module in 2018.

The “Good” of Training to Prevent Sexual Harassment

Well-designed training to prevent sexual harassment can surely make students more aware of the harms of sexual harassment. Training can also make students less likely to commit sexual harassment and more willing to report and resist it. Voluntary training is unlikely to reach large segments of a student population. Colleges and universities offer many good learning activities, but students have limited time. They can't do everything. Voluntary training is also unlikely to reach some of the students who would most benefit from anti-sexual harassment training. As with anything, the problems are often the ones who don't think they're a problem. Required training could well reach students who are most likely to commit sexual harassment without realizing it. Requiring training could, in other words, keep any number of students from facing misconduct charges.

The “Bad and Ugly” of Forced Anti-Sexual Harassment Training

On the other hand, forcing anti-sexual harassment training on students could have its backlash. Certainly, well-designed training can be a good thing, especially when the participants desire the training. But requiring training forces participation by those who don't see the need or have the desire. Negative reaction to compelled participation can make some students less sensitive to the issue rather than more sensitive. That adverse result may be especially likely when the training is not well-designed or properly implemented. Some training is just bad training. And even for those who desire the training and receive good training, training can result in hyper-sensitivity to the issue, producing overreactions. Every little misunderstanding can begin to look like sexual harassment, when they are instead just misunderstandings.

Retain Expert Counsel If Facing Sexual Harassment Charges

The current wave of Title IX allegations and charges on college and university campuses is unlikely to stop soon. Mandatory training may eventually reduce charges, but it may initially increase false or exaggerated allegations. If you face a Title IX sexual misconduct charge, or a broader non-Title IX sexual harassment charge, then your best step is to get national expert help. Don't go it alone. Instead, promptly retain national college and university Title IX sexual-misconduct defense attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm. Your future is on the line. Call 888-535-3686 to schedule a consultation, or use the online service.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.