Blog

The Dangers of Exclusionary Discipline

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Sep 23, 2021 | 0 Comments

We hear a lot these days about prison reform: about racial and economic disparities in our justice system; about what prison does to those who are sent there; and what it does to the families and communities left behind.

We don't talk about these issues in relation to education. After all, what do high school and college students have to do with convicted felons? Yet, the use of “exclusionary discipline” has much in common with our penal system. No wonder it's so frequently associated with the “school to prison pipeline,” the demonstrated fact that students who are subjected to harsh penalties in school eventually wind up incarcerated.

Some critics insist that exclusionary discipline is a necessary component of successful educational programs. The truth is that such punishments only reveal limited thinking.

The Consequences Are Just as Life-Changing

What is “exclusionary discipline”? The phrase refers to removing a student from the normal classroom situation. It sometimes refers to in-school suspension (ISS) but more often relates to out-of-school suspension (OSS). Unsurprisingly, this form of discipline has been associated with a whole range of negative outcomes. For example, students who receive just one suspension are twice as likely as their classmates to be involved as adults in the criminal justice system.

Those who defend the practice try to minimize the damage exclusionary discipline can do, suggesting that all school absences are essentially created equal. One recent op-ed asked, “what's the significant difference between a day out of school for bad behavior and a day out of school for pink eye?” What's the difference between being turned down for a job and being denied a job because you're black, or female, or gay? Labels matter. Being “suspended,” labeled a “problem,” or a “troublemaker,” carries a far different weight than missing school because of a cold.

Exclusionary Discipline Represents a Genuine Lack of Imagination Among Educators

Here's the much bigger problem with the exclusionary discipline argument: it shows a genuine lack of imagination among the very people who should have the most creative solutions to disciplinary problems—our teachers.

The writer of that op-ed piece argues that keeping difficult students in the classroom causes harm to all the other students, the ones who are genuinely trying to learn. That's a great line to use on an eighth-grader who's acting up. It's not especially compelling as pedagogy. It attempts to define “education” in one way—as high test scores—and it suggests that we might be better of simply discarding from society anyone who doesn't seem to fit in for one reason or another.

More importantly, that argument ignores the fact that there are serious racial disparities in how exclusionary discipline is used. Studies have shown, for instance, that black children are far more likely to be suspended than white. The disparity is most striking when applied to girls. One study found that black girls were suspended at a rate of 14% compared to 2% for white girls.

It would be nice if we could simply throw up our hands every time we encountered someone we found difficult and make them disappear. That's not the way the world works, though, and it's certainly not the way teaching should work.

If your child has been subjected to exclusionary discipline, find out what you can do to protect them. Contact attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm at 888-555-3686, or use our automated online form.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. In various capacities, the Lento Law FIrm Team can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu