Supreme Court Could Require Schools to Release Sexual Assault Records

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Oct 30, 2020 | 0 Comments

A new Supreme Court case may have significant ramifications for how universities handle sexual misconduct cases. The University of North Carolina recently petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review a state court ruling that requires the school to reveal sexual assault records.

The Supreme Court's decision will likely impact the privacy of students involved in sexual misconduct cases at colleges across the nation. Here's what you need to know.

What is the UNC Supreme Court Case?

The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled that universities must release student sexual assault records to comply with state records laws. As a result, the University of North Carolina released records showing 15 students violated their sexual assault policy since 2007.

The University of North Carolina is fighting back. In September, University officials petitioned the Supreme Court to review the case. School officials argue that the state public records laws contradict federal privacy laws ensured under the Federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

The university's petition states that school administrators should not release student records that reveal the identity of sexual assault victims. The petition argues that keeping records private helps to ensure the safety and well-being of its students.

What is FERPA?

FERPA is a federal law that mandates schools must protect the privacy of student education records. The law states that schools must have permission from the student to release information from their student record. FERPA does allow schools to release records without consent in some circumstances, such as to comply with a judicial order, subpoena, or state and local authorities.

FERPA also exempts schools from prohibiting the disclosure of results of disciplinary proceedings against students who committed crimes, such as sexual assault. However, schools frequently use FERPA to deny the release of student sexual assault records. A survey of 110 campuses revealed 22 schools refused to disclose campus crime information under FERPA.

What's at Stake

The Supreme Court's decision may decide how universities across the country disclose sexual assault records. If the Supreme Court rules that assault records be made public, it will threaten the privacy of students involved in sexual misconduct cases.

The University of North Carolina's petition states that students accused of sexual misconduct will be open to “the possibility of harassment, retribution, threats to immediate physical safety and a lifelong stigma even if not found guilty.” Many student advocates also believe that disclosing assault records could disrupt investigations, expose victims, and reduce the number of reported cases of misconduct.

Victims and defendants in college sexual misconduct cases currently enjoy privacy protection. North Carolina's court ruling jeopardizes this privacy. Students accused of sexual misconduct may face damages to their reputation and additional barriers to clearing their names.

Nationwide Student Defense

If you or someone you know is accused of sexual misconduct, it's crucial to maintain your privacy. Attorney Joseph D. Lento has fought for the rights and confidentiality of his clients for many years, and has become preeminent in handling college sexual misconduct and Title IX cases across the nation. Attorney Lento and his team at the Lento Law Firm will work tirelessly to protect your privacy and your reputation. Contact us today by calling 888-535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.