Colleges Refusing to Reform Title IX Policies: What That Means For You

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Aug 07, 2018 | 0 Comments

This time last year, Betsy DeVos' Education Department was focused on undoing most of what the Obama Administration fought vigorously to implement: 2011 Title IX guidance that coaxed colleges and universities to internally adjudicate sexual misconduct claims.

When the Obama-era “Dear Colleague” letter was first imposed, it garnered very mixed reactions from collegiate institutions, staff, students, political figures, and spectators. Supporters believed that the guidelines were a good initial effort made towards a complex and nuanced issue. While critics claimed that the Title IX process was unfair, as they argued that it grossly favored complainants. Despite the diverse array of feedback drawn from people on all sides of the spectrum, in later years many came to agree that too often the claims were resolved in a fashion that was insufficient and inequitable. The root cause of these results varies based on who you ask.

The Trump Administration's stance on this issue became remarkably clear after DeVos' team held a summit at the department headquarters. College students accused of sexual assault on campus - falsely, they assert - made a case for why they believe the current guidelines should be reformed or completely rescinded. The presentation even included sexual assault survivors who identified flaws they experienced in the existing process. In September of last year, DeVos ultimately rescinded the existing guidelines.

In place of them, her team gave college institution administrators the option to adjust their procedures in several aspects. Schools are now allowed to use a high standard of proof - the “clear and convincing” standard rather than the lower “preponderance of evidence” standard - for sexual misconduct cases if they see fit. Also, schools have the option of forfeiting binding deadlines to resolve a complaint. DeVos hoped this newfound flexibility would level the playing field and mitigate the problems the previous administration couldn't. But a new study shows that not much has changed despite these efforts.

survey conducted by APCO Worldwide reveals that the vast majority of public and private institutions in the nation have declined to improve their processes, and don't plan to in the future. Of the 100 school administrators who responded, 64 say that they ignored DeVos' reform efforts, and believe that the existing policies are already working well. A mere 8% of these authorities claimed that they regarded the proposed changes as beneficial.

So, for student respondents who feel as if complaints can be themselves due to new guidelines, this couldn't be further from the truth. Respondents have, and still need the help of a legal advisor to help them successfully navigate through school Title IX processes.

Nationwide Title IX Advisor

The only way to make sure your voice is heard and your rights are upheld is to retain a student defense attorney. National Title IX attorney Joseph D. Lento has the skill, experience, and expertise to help you preserve your entitled rights under Title IX and your school's policy. For a case evaluation or more information about his representation, contact him online or give him a call at 888-535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.