Should We Allow Students Falsely Accused of Sexual Misconduct to File a Civil Lawsuit Against School and Accuser?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 09, 2019 | 0 Comments

A couple of our recent blog posts have dealt with Missouri's chaotic attempt to inject some due process into Title IX cases. One confusing aspect of that attempt was how it seemed to forget about the Supremacy Clause – any contradiction between Missouri's state law and the federal Title IX rules and regulations would go in favor of the federal mandate.

A provision that has gotten a bit more media attention, though, was the one that would have allowed students who had been wrongfully accused of sexual misconduct to file a lawsuit against their accusers. This portion of the proposed law bears some more examination.

Provision Would Have Allowed Cleared Students to Sue Their Accusers

The proposed bill was Missouri House Bill 573.

In its original form, HB 573 would have allowed accused students to file a civil lawsuit against their school, Title IX staff members, and even the student who accused them of sexual misconduct, if the accused student was found in violation of Title IX at the school hearing, but was later cleared of wrongdoing on appeal.

That civil lawsuit would have been allowed to recover compensation for lost wages, reduced earning capacity, and mental and emotional suffering from the Title IX allegation, as well as punitive damages and attorney's fees.

Some of this provision in HB 573 was cut out before the bill was set for vote: After the amendments, an accused but subsequently cleared student could only sue their school, not the accuser.

Criticizing the Criticisms of These Lawsuits

Needless to say, victims' advocates and school officials came out strongly against the possibility that schools and accusers could face a lawsuit if the allegations faltered on appeal. Schools claim that the law is too unsettled for them to reasonably be held accountable. Victims' advocates claim that the possibility of a civil lawsuit would chill sexual misconduct allegations.

But do those claims really hold water?

Schools are in a tricky position where they have to pander to the #MeToo movement and adjust to developing standards in the Title IX process. But not all of the law is unsettled. Fundamentals of due process have existed for centuries in America, and the rules are very straightforward in many circumstances. Claiming that it's a shock to learn that accused students have a right to cross-examine their accuser is a non-starter. Holding schools accountable for such clear violations of the law might not be a bad thing.

Allowing civil lawsuits against alleged victims whose allegations of sexual misconduct were overturned on appeal is trickier – many people probably would reconsider initiating a Title IX case if they knew they could be sued, down the road. But the people who would be the most deterred are not sexual assault victims – they are people who know they have a tenuous, weak, or outright false claim. Falsely reporting a crime can itself be a crime, and can lead to a libel or slander lawsuit. Is it really so outrageous to apply the same standard to the Title IX system?

Joseph D. Lento: National Title IX Advisor

Joseph D. Lento is a national Title IX advisorContact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686 if you have been accused of sexual misconduct on campus.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.