Seminary Expels Student for Being in a Same-Sex Marriage in Violation of Its Code of Conduct

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Nov 27, 2019 | 0 Comments

A new Title IX lawsuit has been filed against a theological seminary that allegedly expelled a lesbian student for being in a same-sex marriage. The lawsuit raises a host of some of the most important policy issues that changes to Title IX law have been meant to address.

Seminary Sued for Allegedly Expelling Student in Same-Sex Marriage

The Fuller Theological Seminary, a nondenominational seminary in Pasadena, California, was served with the Title IX claim by one of its former students. That lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in California, claims that the school expelled the female student for marrying another woman. The lawsuit argues that this violated her Title IX rights by discriminating against her sexual orientation.

Complicating matters is the fact that Fuller Seminary's student code explicitly states that the school “expects all members of its community… to abstain from what it holds to be unbiblical sexual practices.” This includes same-sex marriages or “homosexual forms of explicit sexual conduct.”

Lawsuit Touches on Numerous Policy Issues at Heart of Title IX

Like a lot of other laws in the U.S., Title IX aims to satisfy competing interests. They include:

  • Protecting students and others from sexual misconduct
  • Providing due process to those who have been accused
  • Allowing schools to build a campus culture around their curricular interests
  • Promoting equality without stepping on Free Speech rights

Most Title IX claims focus on the protection versus due process policy point. This particular lawsuit, though, pulls some of the other issues into play, as well.

Student Agreed to Code That She Is Now Suing Over

One of the most important and significant aspects of the lawsuit is that the alleged Title IX violation happened when the school enforced one of the rules explicitly laid out in its student policy. That policy, of course, was something that the student had agreed to when she enrolled.

Particularly because the Fuller Theological Seminary is a private school rather than a public one, this becomes important because the due process rights of students in private schools are largely dictated by their contractual rights under the student code.

Yet, here, the student is claiming that it is the federal Title IX law that should rule the case.

Where Is the Line Between Federal Law and School Culture?

Of course, colleges cannot explicitly allow and leave unsanctioned sexual assault when it happens on campus. However, when schools are open for the specific purpose of providing a particular type of education – like a seminary – when can rules against discrimination be enforced over fundamental aspects of that school's line of thought?

Fuller Seminary makes it abundantly clear that it thinks premarital sex is wrong, and that same-sex marriage is wrong. As a private institution, they have a First Amendment right to hold that belief.

Does Title IX entitle students who disagree with that belief – students who have signed a contract to abide by that belief system, no less – to pursue a federal lawsuit any time they're wronged?

Title IX Defense Attorney Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer who represents students and faculty members accused of violating Title IX. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges locally and nationwide while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.