Rhode Island Campus Hazing Defense

For many college students, initiation is a big deal. Whether it's a fraternity, sorority, sports team, or campus club, most organized university groups have at least some way of welcoming new members. Most of these rituals, parties, and welcome ceremonies are positive, time-honored traditions that promote welcome and unity. However, when things go wrong, they often go wrong in a big way, leaving many accused students grappling with consequences they never intended.

Hazing accusations are severe and can impact much more than a student's team or group membership. These allegations can affect their academic standing, future careers, personal lives, and relationships, and in some cases, may even carry criminal charges. Sometimes, these consequences are warranted, but too often, the pursuit of justice comes at the cost of an accused student's rights.

At the Lento Law Firm, we know hazing accusations aren't always as cut-and-dry as they seem, so if someone has accused you, we want to help. Call the Student Defense Team today at 1(888) 535-3686 or contact us online, and together, the Lento Law Firm can help you fight these weighty allegations.

Understanding Hazing in Rhode Island

Rhode Island hazing laws define this behavior as any act that makes participation in a harmful activity or situation a mandatory part of joining a group or club. These activities encompass a wide range of activities that physical abuse, psychological manipulation, and physical harm, and often compromise the safety and dignity of those involved.

For example, some of the hazing activities outlined by the University of Rhode Island include (but are not necessarily limited to):

  • Acts of violence or physical abuse, such as whipping, paddling, beating, or branding.
  • Sleep deprivation.
  • Isolation and exclusion from social interactions and activities.
  • Forced consumption of drugs, alcohol, or any other substance of any substance.
  • Quests, treasure hunts, scavenger hunts, road trips, or other such activities.
  • Embarrassing or degrading public tasks.
  • Sexual harassment.
  • Participation in unwanted sexual activities or behaviors.
  • Threats and intimidation.
  • Verbal abuse, mockery, or humiliation.
  • Dangerous stunts.
  • Extreme endurance tests.
  • Prolonged exposure to unsafe weather, environments, or unsanitary conditions.

This list is not conclusive, but it illustrates how hazing practices all share a common thread of coercion and harm.

If you participated in these actions—or if someone accused you of participating—you may be subject to a university hazing investigation, which could significantly impact your future.

What Happens During a University Hazing Investigation?

Rhode Island law requires universities to investigate all hazing reports quickly and timely. While the exact nature of this process may vary between universities, hazing investigations generally involve several key steps, which look something like this:

  1. Step 1: A Report is Filed. Hazing investigations begin when someone files a report. This may be filed by a student, faculty member, coach, or outside witness.
  2. Step 2: Initial Review. After receiving the report, university officials or hazing prevention officers will review the complaint to determine whether it meets the university's hazing policy and warrants an investigation.
  3. Step 3: Initiating an Investigation. Once the university determines that the complaint is valid, they will likely appoint an investigation team, which could include members of the Office of Student Affairs and Title IX Coordinators and, in some situations, law enforcement. The university must also notify all relevant parties, individuals, and groups that a complaint has been filed and an investigation is underway.
  4. Step 4: Interviews and Evidence. Investigators will interview the complainant, accused individuals, and any witnesses to the event. They will also collect evidence, such as written reports, digital communications (texts and emails), photographs, videos, and any applicable physical evidence.
  5. Step 5: Analyzing the Information. Once the information has been gathered, investigators will analyze the data to determine whether any university policies or state laws were violated. They'll pay particular attention to whether the facts were enough to meet the definition of hazing.
  6. Step 6: Findings and Report. After their review, university officials will compile their findings into a report. This will include the facts, their conclusions, and recommendations for any disciplinary actions.
  7. Step 7: Enforcing Disciplinary Actions. Disciplinary measures can range from warnings and probations to suspension or expulsion for students involved. They can also include sanctions and fines for organizations, which may sometimes result in criminal charges.
  8. Step 8: Appealing the Results. Both sides of the dispute are allowed to appeal the university's findings. Sometimes, a formal hearing may be needed to challenge and find the appropriate outcome.
  9. Step 9: Follow-Up and Monitoring. The university may require educational programs on hazing and policy revisions to prevent future incidents. In some cases, support services (such as counseling and support groups) are also offered to those affected by the hazing.

Rhode Island's anti-hazing laws aim to provide a safe, healthy learning environment for all students. As an accused hazer, this includes you, too.

Regardless of which side of the dispute you're on, all students have the right to a fair investigation. An experienced attorney can ensure your university follows proper procedures and protects your due process rights during this critical process.

The Rights of Accused Hazers During University Investigations

Hazing creates a toxic, dangerous environment for all students, so it's understandable why universities are clamping down so hard on this behavior. Unfortunately, things can sometimes go too far, and zealous investigators often end up trampling the due process rights of accused students in their quest for justice.

Due process is a fundamental legal principle that ensures an accused individual is treated fairly and their rights protected during legal proceedings. Naturally, a collegiate investigation for misconduct isn't the same thing as a proper court of law—the investigators aren't attorneys or judges, their decisions aren't law, and they aren't required to follow the same rules of civil procedure—however, the same principles apply to university processes.

In Rhode Island, universities are required to conduct their investigations fairly. This includes protecting not just victims but also the rights of accused hazers. This means that in an inquiry, you have the right to:

  • Notice of Allegations. You have the right to be informed about the accusations against you. This includes details about the nature of the allegations, the evidence supporting them, and any potential consequences.
  • Opportunity to respond. Accused students should be able to present their side of the story, provide evidence, and respond to allegations. In some cases, this may involve a hearing or meeting where they can defend themselves.
  • An Impartial Decision-Maker. An impartial committee should make all decisions. This helps ensure that their decisions are fair and not influenced by personal biases.
  • Legal Representation. While this might not be a court of law, accused hazers still have the right to be represented by an attorney or advisor during the investigation and hearing process. This is especially important during more severe cases.
  • Access to Evidence and Witnesses. Accused individuals have the right to review and challenge the evidence against them. They also have the right to submit their own evidence and to submit their own witness testimony.
  • A Written Decision. An accused student has the right to receive a written explanation of the investigation's decision, their rationale, and any disciplinary findings.
  • Right to Appeal. If an accused student disagrees with the investigation's findings, they can challenge the outcome or appeal to a higher authority. In some situations, this may involve an outside lawsuit.
  • Protection Against Retaliation. All students have the right to a safe, cohesive learning environment. The university should do everything possible to ensure that accused students are protected from retaliation or discrimination from the hazing event.

These due process rights are designed to ensure that the accused has a fair chance to defend themselves and that any disciplinary actions are based on a thorough and unbiased examination of the facts. An attorney familiar with these policies can help ensure your university upholds the integrity of your disciplinary process.

The Consequences of College Hazing Accusations

The consequences of academic misconduct are significant and far-reaching for students accused of hazing. These effects are felt before an investigation starts, continue throughout the disciplinary proceeding, and often stretch far beyond the proceeding's conclusion.

Students accused of hazing face the loss of team membership and sports participation. Some lose educational opportunities and are burdened by school sanctions, athlete privileges, probation, suspension, and expulsion. Housing and tuition benefits are revoked in other situations, and scholarship eligibility is denied. Student loans may accelerate, creating great financial burdens. The fallout from hazing charges can easily transfer to the organization responsible for the hazing, affecting its reputation and ability to recruit new members and incurring untold financial liability and insurance issues.

Branded a hazer, these accused students face the loss of many friends and social connections. Significant others leave, and family relationships decline beneath media scrutiny. Grades and coursework slip, depression and anxiety set in. Accused hazers are left alone to struggle with the consequences of something they might not even be solely responsible for.

Holding Universities and Organizations Accountable for Their Part

It's easy to point at an accused student and shame them for knowingly participating in something as awful as hazing. However, accused hazers are not the only ones responsible for perpetuating toxic initiation practices.

Too often, these “time-honored” hazing traditions are often perpetuated—and even encouraged—by the coaches, teachers, and university staff in charge of monitoring campus groups. Under these circumstances, older students often feel the same pressure to perpetuate hazing practices as those who are being hazed.

Rhode Island universities are responsible for ensuring that their teams and groups are abiding by state anti-hazing laws. A university that fails to investigate hazing reports on time or fails to uphold its anti-hazing policies can be held liable for damages. Likewise, a school (or individual teacher) who knowingly permitted hazing may be liable for damages, which can be an excellent defense for an accused student.

While students are responsible for their own actions, this accountability shouldn't come at the expense of their due process rights, and certainly not as a way for a university to sidestep its own accountability.

Legal Help is Crucial for Your Hazing Defense

Hazing accusations can significantly impact your life, education, and future career. Local criminal defense attorneys typically lack the academic administrative skills and experience you need in a school disciplinary proceeding, where the rules, customs, and procedures differ from criminal or even civil court proceedings. Instead, retain the skilled and experienced attorney representatives on our Student Discipline Defense Team, to avoid the worst impacts and obtain the best outcome to your hazing charges.

Because education is such a huge factor in these cases, having a legal defense team that understands the policies and procedures at play is important. Our attorneys with substantial academic administrative experience give you the best chance at a successful outcome. We have helped hundreds of students nationwide in hazing and other disciplinary cases obtain their best possible outcomes, preserving their education and reputation.

If you've been accused of campus hazing, here's what you need to do next:

  1. Seek Legal Counsel. The first thing to do is speak to an educational law attorney experienced in campus hazing. They will review the situation with you and give you a better idea of what steps to take next.
  2. Understand the Allegations. Gather as much information as possible regarding the incident and allegations against you.
  3. Review Your University's Hazing Policy. Familiarize yourself with your university's rules and disciplinary procedures, especially the areas revolving around hazing.
  4. Prepare Your Defense. While this isn't a formal hearing, you'll still want to gather as much evidence in your defense as possible. This might include physical evidence such as texts, emails, photos, and witnesses who can corroborate your defense.
  5. Participate in the Investigation. Cooperating with investigators is essential; however, it's important not to answer questions or give interviews without consulting your attorney.
  6. File an Appeal. If you don't like the university's decision, you may want to consider appealing. This might sometimes mean filing a suit outside of the university's disciplinary process.

As an accused student hazer, you have rights, too. Talk to an attorney today to find out what you should do next.

Campus Hazing Defense in Rhode Island

Resolving a hazing dispute can be an emotionally draining and demoralizing process. But the good news is you don't have to fight it alone. If you've been accused of campus hazing, we want to hear from you. Call the Student Defense Team today at 1(888) 535-3686 or contact us online, and let the Lento Law Firm help defend your rights during this evolving process.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu