Remote Learning May Prompt Misconduct in Manitoba

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Mar 12, 2021 | 0 Comments

Implementing and embracing remote or virtual learning is proving to be difficult for colleges and universities all over the continent.

‘Going virtual' invites many different types of issues, from snags in the onboarding process to the technical nature of embracing a more internet-based learning platform. This new normal for the academic world presents steep challenges for everyone involved.

One effect that this quick, mass pivot to online studies has had regards perceived student conduct. As more colleges and students shift to remote learning models, the rates of academic misconduct have spiked and skyrocketed.

University of Manitoba's Academic Misconduct Rates Spike Disconcertingly

New data coming out of the University of Manitoba shows that allegations of cheating rose seven-fold over the course of the 2019-2020 academic years.

Their latest annual disciplinary report discusses the instances of academic misconduct as well as other inappropriate student behavior. When university officials compared the data to the dates the school had initiated remote learning, the correlation became clear. In the year prior to promoting virtual coursework, the university had received some 706 allegations of misconduct. The year that students shifted to learning online, the school received 1,137 allegations.

The allegations covered a wide variety of types of misconduct, including plagiarism, duplicate submission, cheating, and fraud. The committee reviewing this data did note that it seemed instances of non-academic misconduct have become less common, while cheating has been on the rise.

The Challenges Facing Today's Students in a Remote-Learning Era

When you think about the specific ways that students learn virtually, however, it might become clear why it seems that students have been cheating more. For example:

  • In at least one instance, students faced allegations of cheating because several students took online exams from a single device, as identified by a common IP address. This could signify collaboration; however, it could also simply represent a shared device.
  • Other allegations have sought to demonstrate that students cheated because they communicated during their exams or had access to unauthorized material. In remote learning circumstances, it can be challenging to show that these acts constituted cheating. (Perhaps the communication was an accident, an emergency, or had nothing to do with the subject matter; perhaps the student clicked on a link in an online learning portal that shouldn't have been active.) On the other hand, showing that these actions were innocent can be equally difficult.

Some teachers at the University of Manitoba are brainstorming measures they can take to prevent cheating methods—and reduce opportunities for allegations of misconduct, or ways students can accidentally find themselves in a tough situation. These solutions include fewer multiple-choice questions, pre-quiz academic integrity assessments, and making sure the terms and conditions surrounding online exams are crystal-clear.

However, that might not be enough.

Representatives of the university also note that students are experiencing COVID-19 uncertainty, increased student fees, and mental health concerns. If you're a student working hard to adapt to virtual learning, you're struggling. You're spending a lot of your time adapting to circumstances beyond your control. The last thing you need is an allegation of academic misconduct while you're trying to navigate the challenges of modern education.

If you need assistance fighting for your education and your future, contact Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm today at 888-535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.