Blog

Proctoring Software Ruling: Scanning Student’s Room Violates Privacy

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Oct 22, 2022 | 0 Comments

During the pandemic, many schools accelerated their use of online proctoring software such as Proctorio or Honorlock. Proctoring, whether in person or online, has its own challenges, however, the pandemic especially exacerbated the problems with online proctoring software. Even though many schools are back to in-person classes, online proctoring has continued.

And student concerns around it also have progressed. In some instances, students are even suing schools. Enter Aaron Ogletree, who sued Cleveland State University.

Recent Court Ruling Determines That Room Scans Violate Fourth Amendment Rights

In spring 2021, while working from his home, Ogletree was required to scan his bedroom in order to participate in his chemistry test. He refused, stating that his room had confidential tax documents in it. However, in the end, he agreed to the scan, which took less than a minute. The scan was stored with a third-party vendor (although it's unclear which one), such as ProctorU or Proctorio. Some of the scanning services use AI to determine whether or not there is a problem with what is in the room, whereas other services have a human who reviews the room at the time of the scan.

Ogletree sued the university, claiming that they violated his rights against unreasonable search and seizure, which are protected by the Fourth Amendment. In August 2022, Judge J Philip Calabrese sided with Ogletree.  At the end of Calabrese's opinion, he states, "Based on consideration of these factors, individually and collectively, the Court concludes that Mr. Ogletree's privacy interest in his home outweighs Cleveland State's interests in scanning his room. Accordingly, the Court determines that Cleveland State's practice of conducting room scans is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.”

Problems With and Concerns About Online Proctoring Software

Beyond issues of privacy, online proctoring software raises many other concerns for students. AI can be inaccurate in its determination that cheating occurred—and some vendors only offer a human review at a higher price point. Introducing subjectivity is another concern—for example when a professor reviews the footage to make a decision about whether or not behavior counts as cheating. Finally, bias is an issue. Computer programs and algorithms are only as good as the people who write them. This means that bias can be written directly into the program.

Nationwide Attorney-Advisor Who Can Help With Your Online Proctoring Concerns

If you're facing accusations of cheating due to online proctoring software used by your college or university, it's important to find an attorney-advisor with experience in this specialized area. Attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm have worked with countless families all throughout the country. They can help you navigate the process at your school in order to achieve the best possible results, and they can take matters to court nationwide to seek justice when needed.  Contact the Lento Law Firm today with your questions by calling 888.535.3686 or reaching out online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. In various capacities, the Lento Law FIrm Team can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu