Why Some Colleges Are Outsourcing Sexual Assault Investigations

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jun 14, 2018 | 0 Comments

In Title IX sexual assault cases, due process, impartiality, and fairness are essential to maintaining integrity and securing fair results. With the removal of Obama-era Title IX guidelines, there's been an emphasis placed on respondent rights in the midst of higher education adjudication processes. Many have accused the former administration's guidance of being grossly impartial to accusers. They claim that the “Dear Colleague” letter created an incentive for overzealous administrators to completely disregard the rights of the accused while conceiving ample protections for the accused, and ultimately perpetuating an unfair system.

Schools have felt immense pressure from people on both sides of the spectrum to improve how they approach and handle these processes. Hence why it's not surprising that under new guidelines - proposed and implemented by Education Secretary Betsy DeVos - some institutions are deciding to take an alternative course of action that alleviates them from accountability. Instead of leaving Title IX investigations in the hands of college authorities or panels, they're choosing to hire outside parties to do the work for them. It's become increasingly popular for lawyers and law enforcement agents to conduct investigations at schools, and for retired judges to oversee disciplinary proceedings.

Over the years, lawsuits initiated by both complainants and respondents alleging discrimination have been filed against schools. Title IX adjudication processes do present potential conflict of interests for colleges to indulge. Some students are merely dissatisfied with how investigations and hearings are conducted. They claim that schools lack the appropriate tools, investigative prowess, and experience to resolve these cases fairly. In agreement with this sentiment, some schools have decided to let the well-trained professionals handle these cases.

One of the main reasons why colleges have taken this step is to properly assess and determine evidentiary standards. For people with no knowledge of weighing evidence based on the “preponderance of evidence” standard, this concept is difficult to grapple with, let alone apply to intricate sexual misconduct cases. Now that the Department of Education will allow for students to implement either the “preponderance of evidence” or the “clear and convincing” evidence standard, it complicates these processes entirely.

A notable critique of outsourcing investigations is that sometimes the public has the tendency to confuse campus hearings with a courtroom. Institutions have to constantly reiterate that these are two distinguished proceedings that call for different practices. Critics claim that including lawyers, judges, and law enforcement agents in these processes muddy the waters and contribute to the confusion.

But overall, institutions who outsource claim that their efforts have been successful.

Title IX Attorney Helping Clients Nationwide

The only way to make sure your voice is heard and your rights are upheld is to retain a student defense attorney. National Title IX attorney Joseph D. Lento has the skill, experience, and expertise to help you preserve your entitled rights under Title IX and your school's policy. For a case evaluation or more information about his representation, contact him online or give him a call at 888-535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.